메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
천우현 (울산대학교) 정기효 (울산대학교)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회지 대한인간공학회지 제40권 제2호
발행연도
2021.4
수록면
75 - 87 (13page)
DOI
10.5143/JESK.2021.40.2.75

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: This study was intended to develop two risk assessment systems that can evaluate OWAS scores and action level with good accuracy and reliability to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).
Background: Since risk assessment methods such as OWAS and REBA are relied on visual observations, their accuracy and reliability might have been in questions. Therefore, computer-aided risk assessment systems are necessary to enhance accuracy and reliability as well as to improve applicability in workplaces.
Method: This study developed vector-based OWAS (V-OWAS) and deep learning-based OWAS (DL-OWAS). V-OWAS (partial automation) asks a user to manually identify the key joint positions from a working picture and automatically calculates OWAS scores and action level. DL-OWAS (high automation) automatically identifies the key positions and determines OWAS scores and action level. To evaluate the performance of the two systems, we used 40 working pictures and compared the results of the two systems with the results of four ergonomic experts with over 10-year experience who did assess based on traditional visual observations.
Results: The two systems showed similar assessment results with those obtained from the ergonomic experts. The agreement percentage of V-OWAS (91.3%) with the experts was slightly better than DL-OWAS (90%). On the other hand, the usability score of DL-OWAS (7 out of 7 point Likert scale) was significantly higher than V-OWAS (5.75) and traditional visual observation (5.25).
Conclusion: V-OWAS had an advantage in accuracy of identifying the key joint positions; but it required more time and efforts over DL-OWAS. DL-OWAS can assess automatically; but its accuracy might be low if some parts of the body are obscured due to some reasons (e.g., obscured by some machine). Therefore, it is recommended to use V-OWAS or DL-OWAS according to the condition of working picture.
Application: The two OWAS systems developed in this study can help industrial practitioners effectively and efficiently assess working posture for preventing WMSDs.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Development of V-OWAS System
3. Development of DL-OWAS System
4. Performance Evaluation of the Developed Systems
5. Discussion and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-530-001679540