지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 55 - 63 (9page)
- DOI
- 10.5143/JESK.2021.40.1.55
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective: The aims of this study are to review applications of systemic accident analysis methods such as Accimap, STAMP and FRAM and to compare them.
Background: The systems thinking approach to understanding socio-technical system accidents is the dominant paradigm within accident analysis research. It views accidents as the result of unexpected, uncontrolled relationships between a system’s constituent parts with the requirement that systems are analyzed as whole entities, rather than considering their parts in isolation.
Method: This study was based on the literature survey. The literature was searched through academic database of ScienceDirect using the key words of systemic accident analysis, Accimap, STAMP and FRAM.
Results: The survey showed that thanks to its characteristics for requiring small resource and less analyzing time, Accimap was adopted in accident analyses the most frequently of the three techniques. The systemic methods have been more frequently used in the regions of Europe, North America and Oceania. STAMP provided a more effective means of applying the systems thinking approach, compared to Accimap and FRAM. While STAMP was more reliable, Accimap provided succinct graphical summary of accident. FRAM may take the longest time and require the largest amount of resource for analyzing accidents, which resulted in better way for extracting recommendations for improving systems. A previous study pointed out that in addition to practicalities, method adoption was most influenced by its usability and validity.
Conclusion: Accimap have been used the most frequently, while STAMP and FRAM was easier in establishing preventive measures.
Application: The results of this study can be used as useful guidelines for adopting an appropriate method for the accidents analyzed.
Background: The systems thinking approach to understanding socio-technical system accidents is the dominant paradigm within accident analysis research. It views accidents as the result of unexpected, uncontrolled relationships between a system’s constituent parts with the requirement that systems are analyzed as whole entities, rather than considering their parts in isolation.
Method: This study was based on the literature survey. The literature was searched through academic database of ScienceDirect using the key words of systemic accident analysis, Accimap, STAMP and FRAM.
Results: The survey showed that thanks to its characteristics for requiring small resource and less analyzing time, Accimap was adopted in accident analyses the most frequently of the three techniques. The systemic methods have been more frequently used in the regions of Europe, North America and Oceania. STAMP provided a more effective means of applying the systems thinking approach, compared to Accimap and FRAM. While STAMP was more reliable, Accimap provided succinct graphical summary of accident. FRAM may take the longest time and require the largest amount of resource for analyzing accidents, which resulted in better way for extracting recommendations for improving systems. A previous study pointed out that in addition to practicalities, method adoption was most influenced by its usability and validity.
Conclusion: Accimap have been used the most frequently, while STAMP and FRAM was easier in establishing preventive measures.
Application: The results of this study can be used as useful guidelines for adopting an appropriate method for the accidents analyzed.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
Altabbakh, H. / 2014 / STAMP - Holistic safety approach or just another risk model? / Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 32:109~119
de Carvalho, P. V. R. / 2011 / The use of functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience / Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96(11):1482~1498
Filho, A. P. G. / 2019 / Four studies, two models, one accident - An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis / Safety Science 113:310~317
Goode, N. / 2017 / Developing a contributing factor classification scheme for Rasmussen's AcciMap: Reliability and validity evaluation / Applied Ergonomics 64:14~26
Hollnagel, E. / 2004 / Barriers and Accident Prevention / Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
de Carvalho, P. V. R. / 2011 / The use of functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience / Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96(11):1482~1498
Filho, A. P. G. / 2019 / Four studies, two models, one accident - An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis / Safety Science 113:310~317
Goode, N. / 2017 / Developing a contributing factor classification scheme for Rasmussen's AcciMap: Reliability and validity evaluation / Applied Ergonomics 64:14~26
Hollnagel, E. / 2004 / Barriers and Accident Prevention / Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A FRAM-based systemic analysis for a crane collision accident on shipyard
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2021 .06
-
Comparison of Systemic Accident Investigation Techniques Based on the Sewol Ferry Capsizing
대한인간공학회지
2017 .10
-
국내외 사례분석을 통한 중소규모 사업장의 효과적 지원방안 -AcciMap 분석기법을 이용하여-
한국위험물학회지
2024 .12
-
Needs for Changing Accident Investigation from Blaming to Systems Approach
대한인간공학회지
2016 .06
-
Analysis of Fukushima Accident in Resilience Engineering Perspective Using the FRAM (Functional Resonance Analysis Method)
대한인간공학회지
2018 .06
-
FRAM을 사용한 후쿠시마 사고 대응 분석
대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집
2017 .11
-
A Study on the Systematic Cause Analysis of Shipboard Fire Accident Case using STAMP Methodology
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2023 .10
-
DSC 기반 철도위험 관리를 위한 FRAM 모델을 활용한 철도운행 안전 최적 대안 선정 방안 연구
전기학회논문지
2024 .11
-
STAMP 기법을 활용한 황산 포장 중의 화재사고 분석
한국위험물학회지
2024 .01
-
2020년 산업재해로 발생한 재해자의 특성요인 분석을 통한 산업재해저감방안 도출
대한인간공학회지
2022 .10
-
건축건설공사의 재해분석에 관한 연구
한국안전학회지
2016 .01
-
사고 보고 활성화를 위한 사고 미보고 원인 분석
대한인간공학회지
2019 .12
-
목조접합부 보강재의 인장강도에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .04
-
국내 화학사고 통계분석 및 주요사고 사례 검토에 관한 연구
한국위험물학회지
2017 .06
-
사고보고문서를 이용한 텍스트 기반 사고발생 유형 및 관계 분석
한국안전학회지
2018 .01
-
최근 국내 화학사고 통계 분석 : 소방청 기초자료 중심으로
한국위험물학회지
2023 .07
-
승강장 스크린도어 사고예방을 위한 안전관리 방안 연구
대한토목학회 학술대회
2016 .10
-
산업 및 사고 유형별 산업재해 사망자의 10년간 추세 분석을 통한 재해 발생 특성 고찰
대한인간공학회지
2025 .02
-
건설 재해사례 보고서의 텍스트 마이닝을 통한 복합사고 패턴 분석
대한건축학회논문집
2022 .04
-
GFRP로 보강된 목조 접합부에 관한 구조적 거동에 관한 실험적 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-530-001679368