메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
차정민 (경민대학교)
저널정보
한국위험물학회 한국위험물학회지 한국위험물학회지 제9권 제1호
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
54 - 65 (12page)
DOI
10.31333/kihm.2021.9.1.54

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, ethylene was selected from the chemical products with relatively high volume at Ulsan Port, converted to the equivalent of TNT for each accident scenario, and overpressure was estimated through the distance from explosion to determine the damage. Assuming the “worst accident scenario”, the equivalent of ethylene, which is within 40m of the storm, is estimated to exceed the maximum of "crater" damage, which is about 50 minutes of leakage under the “alternative accident scenario”.
In addition, if ethylene leaks, fires, and explosions occur during the unloading of port facilities, the extent of damage to “toxic”, “poolfire” and “vapor explosion” was quantitatively evaluated through hypothetical scenarios. The evaluation method used the KORA program supported by the Korea Chemical Safety Institute as a general-purpose program, and predicted the extent of damage to ethylene leaks, fires and explosions, and found that the scope of accident damage was reduced in “alternative accident scenario” compared to “worst accident scenario.” The damage impact range was reduced to 78% for toxicity, 4.45% for face-to-face fires, and 14.47% for steam cloud explosions. Furthermore, as the leakage time increased, the damage impact range increased by 125.98% compared to the leakage time of 5min, and the damage impact range increased by up to 158.72% at 20min.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구결과 및 고찰
Ⅳ. 결론
References

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0