메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김영민 (서울시립대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회논문집 大韓建築學會論文集 第37卷 第6號(通卷 第392號)
발행연도
2021.6
수록면
117 - 126 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Until now Le Corbusier has been accused of the sin separating modern architecture from nature. However, Le Corbusier had never insisted that his architecture was disconnected from the outer world, rather he had tried to establish a close relationship between the built environment and nature. The purpose of this study is to track where the negative perception of Le Corbusier’s perspective on nature was originated from and how it had been developed. In the 1920s, Le Corbusier’s attitude on nature reflected in his abstract and mechanic architecture was blamed by Häring and Wright who supported the concept of Organic Architecture. Later on, the interpretation of Hitchcock and Gideon strengthened the bias on the separation between architecture and nature in Le Corbusier’s theory and practice. Even though Le Corbusier’s attitude towards nature had changed significantly in the 1930s, the schema of the 1920s was fixed by both his supports and dissenters as his international influence of works and theory of the 1920s became greater. New theoretical interpretation on Le Corbusier in the 1960s, suggested by Rowe and Eisenman did not change the stereotype view but reinforced it. In the 1970s Rowe provides a complete version of abstract schema on architecture and nature by expanding Gideon’s interpretation of Le Corbusier to the city. After the 1980s, there have been ongoing efforts to reevaluate Le Corbusier’s thoughts and works on the landscape, it is hard to say that the theoretical view on his perspectives on nature is changed much. Le Corbusier’s influence and contribution on forming the framework of the modern landscape still remains to be further discovered.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 백색 건축의 자연관에 대한 평가
3. 건축적 변화와 새로운 자연관에 대한 평가
4. 새로운 해석과 평가
5. 결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-540-001878085