지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.5
- 수록면
- 296 - 296 (1page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background
Previous upper midline abdominal surgery is a reported relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aimed to investigate the effects of previous upper abdominal surgery on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; we evaluated the effects of the previous upper abdominal surgery type on laparoscopic cholecystectomy with respect to complications and conversion to open surgery.
Methods
We prospectively evaluated 1258 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including those who underwent upper midline abdominal surgery previously, at a single tertiary referral center. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes—open conversion rate, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay—were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the previous surgical method into the gastric (n=77), non-gastric (n=40), and control (n=1141) groups. Patients in the gastric + non-gastric groups (n=117) were 1:1 matched with those in the control group (n=117) using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
Before PSM, age, sex, open convers ... 전체 초록 보기
Previous upper midline abdominal surgery is a reported relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aimed to investigate the effects of previous upper abdominal surgery on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; we evaluated the effects of the previous upper abdominal surgery type on laparoscopic cholecystectomy with respect to complications and conversion to open surgery.
Methods
We prospectively evaluated 1258 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including those who underwent upper midline abdominal surgery previously, at a single tertiary referral center. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes—open conversion rate, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay—were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the previous surgical method into the gastric (n=77), non-gastric (n=40), and control (n=1141) groups. Patients in the gastric + non-gastric groups (n=117) were 1:1 matched with those in the control group (n=117) using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
Before PSM, age, sex, open convers ... 전체 초록 보기
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy : a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2015 .08
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single- fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better?
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2025 .02
-
Influencing factors on postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2016 .02
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Single Center’s Initial Experiences of Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy and Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .10
-
Laparoscopic Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2024 .03
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : A Retrospective Observational Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) versus Standard Recovery for Elective Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Gastric Cancer Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
Comparision of Single incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy : History and overview
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using mini laparoscopic instruments
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0