메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문영희 (전남대학교)
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제63권 제2호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
85 - 107 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper explores how the counter-memory narratives in Kate Grenville’s Sarah Thornhill question and disrupt Australian cultural memory. Whereas Australia’s mainstream cultural memories represent ‘what we should be,’ Grenville’s counter-memory divulges the falsehood of the official memory and identifies ‘what we really are.’ Sarah Thornhill grows up not knowing anything of what her father William Thornhill did to Aborigines for the sake of taking up the land which she called home. Later on Sarah finds out the secret of her father and all the stories made up on William Thornhill’s wealth. Nevertheless, she admits that she is herself implicated in father’s guilt because she is one of the beneficiaries of the wrongdoings of the traumatic past, even though her counter-memories break the continuity of family’s glory. The novel also deals with the issue of ‘The Stolen Generation’ that was produced by Australian Founding Fathers. Sarah is asked to visit M?ori in New Zealand to present a eulogy at Rugig’s wake. Her counter-memory remembers ‘against the grain’ that she did not protect Rugig and sat on the sidelines of the abuse. Finally Sarah’s shame moves her to make an apology through which she asks readers to remember responsible memories of the traumatic past.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0