메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Diogo Turiani Hourneax de Moura (Harvard Medical School) Marvin Ryou (Harvard Medical School) Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux De Moura (Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo) Igor Braga Ribeiro (Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo) Wanderlei Marques Bernardo (Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo) Christopher C. Thompson (Brigham and Women’s Hospital)
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제53권 제4호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
417 - 428 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: The diagnosis of biliary strictures can be challenging. There are no systematic reviews studying same-sessionendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based tissue sampling and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needleaspiration (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on studies analyzing same-session EUS and ERCP for tissue diagnosis of suspectedmalignant biliary strictures. The primary outcome was the accuracy of each method individually compared to the two methodscombined. The secondary outcome was the accuracy of each method in pancreatic and biliary etiologies. In the meta-analysis, we usedForest plots, summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and estimates of the area under the curve for intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Of the 12,132 articles identified, six were included, resulting in a total of 497 patients analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity,positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy of the association between the two methods were: 86%, 98%, 12.50,0.17, and 96.5%, respectively. For the individual analysis, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 76%, 100%, and94.5%, respectively; for ERCP-based tissue sampling, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 58%, 98%, and 78.1%, respectively. For pancreatic lesions, EUS-FNA was superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling. However, for biliary lesions, both methods had similarsensitivities. Conclusions: Same-session EUS-FNA and ERCP-based tissue sampling is superior to either method alone in the diagnosis of suspectedmalignant biliary strictures. Considering these results, combination sampling should be performed when possible.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0