메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
John Alexander Lata Guacho (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Igor Braga Ribeiro (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S) Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de Moura (Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pediatric Unit Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Megui Marilia Mansilla Gallegos (Servicio de Gastroenterologia Clinica Maison de Sante del Sur Lima-Peru Lima Peru) Thomas McCarty (Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Endoscopy Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston MAUSA) Ricardo Katsuya Toma (Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pediatric Unit Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de Moura (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de S)
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제54권 제2호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
242 - 249 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflationremains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluateinsufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients. Methods: Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databasesfollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane workingmethodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated foroutcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure. Results: The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) wereincluded in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference,10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lowerin the CO2 group (risk difference [RD], -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure wassimilar (RD, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11). Conclusions: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediatelyfollowing the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO2 is a preferred insufflationtechnique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0