메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

Critical Review of Major Amendment to the Wastes Control Act
Recommendations
Search

폐기물관리법 개정의 주요내용에 대한 비판적 고찰

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
PARK KYUN SUNG (경희대학교)
Journal
한국환경법학회 환경법연구 환경법연구 제42권 제2호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2020.1
Pages
293 - 319 (27page)

Usage

cover
Critical Review of Major Amendment to the Wastes Control Act
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
In recent years, the illegal or inappropriate treatment of waste has rapidly increased, and the problem of secondary environmental infringement has been seriously raised. However, that is not handled properly, since many people in charge of treatment of unsuitable wastes disposal can't afford by themselves, and the execution by proxy for treatment is not performed well due to the lack of its budget etc.. To cope with this, the Waste Control Act was revised on 26 November 2019 and was implemented on 27 May 2020. The purpose of this article is to analyse the main amendments of the Waste Control Act, focusing on the proper treatment of unsuitably treated wastes, and to find solutions to the problems of the revised Waste Control Act in terms of interpretative and legislative theories. The main contents revised to prevent improper disposal of waste and to promptly treat waste improperly treated are as follows. The government-level management and supervision to waste management by local governments has been strengthened, and regulations have been strengthened on household waste discharge person. Regulations on waste treatment business persons or companies were also strengthened. In order to enhance the managerial effectiveness of improper wastes, we expanded the scope of the person responsible for disposing of unsuitable wastes, strengthened their responsibilities, and strengthened the effectiveness of execution by proxy. However, It has been insufficient for the revision of this Waste Control Act. The following supplements are needed in the future. The consignment contract for the disposal of household wastes should be regarded as a contract under the public law, and management supervision of the trustees of the mayor, county, and ward offices who are the consignors of household wastes should be strengthened. Regulations on recyclable household waste should be strengthened. The reason for the waste disposal business person's fault must be interpreted in accordance with the legislative purpose, and furthermore, it should be clearly defined. Those who is targeted of orders among a number of persons responsible for of inappropriate disposing wastes should be determined, and criteria for determining the scope of action orders should be clarified. It is desirable to define the agency with action order power and vicarious executive power and the payment-order for vicarious executive expenses in consideration of the types of unsuitable teated waste, responsibility to wastes treatment, or administrative agencies responsible for management and supervision. Criteria for equitable distribution of vicarious execution expenses among multiple managers should also be established.
#부적정처리폐기물 #부적정처리폐기물의 처리 #폐기물처리에 대한 관리감독 #폐기물처리책임 #부적정처리폐기물처리의 대집행

Contents

No content found

References (23)

Add References
金蓮泰 / 2003 / 폐기물의 개념 및 분류·처리체계-독일의 순환관리 및 폐기물법을 중심으로- / 환경법연구 25(1):6~208 google schola 김중수 / 2011 / 한일폐기물법제에 있어서의 원인자부담원칙 / 환경법연구 33(2):191~215 dbpia 김홍균 / 2017 / 환경법 / 홍문사 google schola 류광해 / 2007 / 폐기물관리법 제48조 제1항 제3호 후문의 문제점 / 법학연구 18(2):53~68 dbpia 박종수 / 2011 / 행정법신론 제15판 / 박영사 google schola

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

3D Printing of Food
Jie SunThe korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition2019.10

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.