메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김광준 (연세대학교)
저널정보
대한골다공증학회 Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Vol.5 No.1
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
1 - 1 (1page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is well known how important it is to continue taking medications for the treatment of osteoporosis in fracture patients [1]. Indeed, many academic societies emphasize the importance of taking osteoporosis medications in fracture patients to prevent first fractures, as well as to prevent secondary fractures [2]. This is because of the probability of refracture increases if the osteoporosis medication is not taken continuously after fracture [3]. Therefore, several academic organizations for managing osteoporosis such as International Osteoporosis Foundation and Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS) emphasize that it is very important to actively prescribe osteoporosis medication in patients with fractures and to educate patients to take osteoporosis medication continuously [4]. In practice, however, osteoporosis medications are not properly prescribed even in fractured patients due to various practical problems. Heyman et al. [5] published an original article about coordination project for improvement of osteoporosis medication use among patients who sustained an osteoporotic fracture in Israel. Although the researchers did not find the effect of coordinating the osteoporosis medication as expected, this study is well worth it. Researchers’ efforts to investigate whether joint coordination between health care providers in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and health care providers in a community setting improves osteoporosis medication use in the community is of value. The coordination project presented in this study is based on the concept of a fracture liaison service (FLS), a coordinated, comprehensive, and active treatment model based on primary care or secondary care with the objective of dealing with the osteoporosis treatment gap [6]. Nonetheless, it is not known whether coordination between different medical settings can lead to similar improvements in the use of osteoporosis medication. The most striking finding of this study was that the issue of insurance should be fully considered when prescribing osteoporosis medications in countries with insurance system (public insurance), such as Israel, South Korea, Taiwan [7]. Given the constraints of the government-supported drug baskets (not all medicines are on the list of official medicines to cover the costs of public health systems), recommendations for teriparatide, an expensive medication provided by the government-funded medical basket only for patients with fractures while receiving a high-cost treatment for osteoporosis, might be decreased. Because osteoporosis treatments and therapies are expensive, unauthorized patients may not be able to obtain the recommended treatment at the hospital facility. This is a huge barrier to both patients and physicians. Problems related to cost are difficult to solve. However, this problem is an important issue to be solved at the academic society level. The academic society such as AFOS should try to make the treatment guideline fully considering the cost part, or give an active opinion when making insurance policy so that the patients with osteoporosis should get the best osteoporosis treatment appropriate to the condition of the patient.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (7)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0