메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이선 (고려대학교)
저널정보
국제법평론회 국제법평론 국제법평론 제59호
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
169 - 194 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Adopted in 2010, the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing was developed from the principles of permanent sovereignty over natural resources and the search for sustainable development. In order to prevent “biopiracy” from former colonizing countries, the Nagoya Protocol establishes a bilateral benefit-sharing system between provider country and user of genetic resources. Furthermore, to contribute to the “conservation of biological diversity and sustainable use of its components,” and economic development, the Nagoya Protocol provides legal and institutional settings to achieve economic and environmental sustainability through the distribution of benefits to stewards of the ecosystem. However, the Nagoya Protocol has faced several challenges in the adoption of the bilateral benefit-sharing system. The effectiveness of the bilateral benefit-sharing system depends highly on national legislative measures to implement the Nagoya Protocol in both the provider and the user countries. This study finds that many national legislative measures on access and benefit-sharing (ABS) in both provider and user countries are often complicated, complex, inadequate and/or ineffective. This leads to inefficiencies in accessing and utilizing genetic resources for users. Inefficient legislative measures reduce potential shared benefit and affects the “conservation of biodiversity and sustainable use of its components” in a negative way. A bilateral approach to benefit-sharing appears to be a fundamental issue to address. The role of biotechnology, and specifically Digital Sequence Information on Genetic Resources (DSI), in the “conservation of biodiversity and sustainable use of its components” is an important factor to consider. Generation of DSI starts from the extraction of particular molecules of organisms and ecosystems that are able to be genetically sequenced, so it can be argued that generating DSI, and use of DSI, fall under the definition of “utilization of genetic resources” in Article 2(c) and “subsequent use and commercialization” in Article 5 of the Nagoya Protocol, respectively. Although DSI can be covered under the Nagoya Protocol, it is difficult to manage ABS on DSI under the bilateral benefit-sharing system of the Nagoya Protocol: considering the usage of DSI in practice, it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain Prior Informed Consent (PIC) and/or establish Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT). In this regard, this study argues that establishment of the Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism (GMBSM) foreseen in Article 10 of the Nagoya Protocol should be taken into serious consideration. Through examination of examples and cases, this study argues that there are specific situations that justify the establishment of the GMBSM. It also attempts to provide a framework for possible modalities of the GMBSM that would not undermine the bilateral approach upon which the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol are founded.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0