메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
민현석 (한양대학교)
저널정보
대구가톨릭대학교 인문과학연구소 인문과학연구 인문과학연구 제34호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
1 - 19 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to reveal why synonymy blocking is not applied to some denominal verbs such as brush and comb by analyzing the meanings of noun-to-verb conversion pairs. In this respect, this paper deals with two issues: conversion, one of the economical and productive word-formation rules for the creation of new words and synonymous blocking, restraint on generating redundant words. Blocking occurs when an existing word can only block a newly derived one if they are completely synonymous. Classical examples for blocking are the blocking of *stealer because of existence of thief. There are, however, some cases where blocking does not occur in noun-to-verb conversion pairs. Although a word sweep is a well-established word in the lexicon, a verb broom is derived from its parent noun form through conversion. Likewise, converted verbs brush and comb appearing to be synonymous do not block each other in the process of derivation. In this sense, it is necessary to analyze the meanings of noun-to-verb conversion pairs in order to reveal the reason that synonymy blocking is overridden in denominal verbs. As an attempt to identify complete synonymy between existing words and derived words, this paper looks into three respects: how to capture conceptual contiguity between parent nouns and its derived verbs, how to understand the conceptual difference between existing verbs and denominal verbs, and why conversion pairs like brush and comb appear to be synonymous.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0