메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
류영환 (서울의료원 영상의학과) 이수형 (서울의료원) 김미영 (서울의료원 간호부) 곽종길 (동신대학교 보건의료학과) 동경래 (광주보건대학교)
저널정보
한국방사선산업학회 방사선산업학회지 방사선산업학회지 제12권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
139 - 143 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We have started this study in an attempt to measure facility spaces’ Radon density and minimize Radon damages to human health accounting for measurement values. The subject of this study is a general hospital situated within the Seoul metropolitan area, the Seoul Medical Center. The Radon density measurement points were dispersed as following for comparison among spatial categorization: 17 spots within office areas (places where only hospital employees occupy), 25 spots within patients’ waiting area (occupied by employees, patients, patient caretakers, general passerby), 22 spots within treatment areas (occupied by employees or patients). For comparison among building levels, 10 places were picked within the basement area (5 on the first basement level, 1 on the second basement level, 2 on the third basement level, 2 on the fourth basement level), 54 places above ground (25 on the first floor, 27 on the second, 2 on the third). For comparison based on the factor of window existence, 21 spots without windows and 43 spots with windows were compared. Measurement was carried out for the duration of four months by Alpha track detectors with the removal of LR-115 tapes. These detectors are fixed to the wall with a one meter length string hanging from a half-circle shaped link fixed upright at a right angle on the ceiling at the center of the measurement area. As a manual detector, for Alpha track detector measurement to be properly conducted, it should be used under minimized circumstantial changes from the usual status quo for the duration of measurement. Study collaborators have kept the environmental factors constant while measuring Radon density, with indoors detectors being comprised of two types, passive and active detectors. These two types could be differentiated apart by their electric power source. Passive detectors are easier to maneuver and are more economical in their costs than their active counterparts. Few demerits persist, however, in that passive detectors have more difficulty achieving prompt long term measurements and are more prone to lowered reliability in their measurements due to external environmental factors. Despite these shortcomings, for its relative low costs and efficiency, collaborators have decided on using Alpha track detector LR-115 device for the purpose of this study. The mean Radon concentration level of the 21 places with windows was 58.00 Bq·m-3, with the 43 places without windows mean level being 62.93 Bq·m-3, The mean difference of approximately 5 Bq·m-3 with windowed places being lower in Radon concentration levels were nonsignifican t (p>0.05). The reason why lower Radon density was measured in windowed areas could be postulated to be due to airing and emission of Radon from measured indoors to outdoors. In the comparisons between workspace categorizations, the mean Radon density level of the 17 places within office areas (occupied only by hospital employees) was 58.18 Bq·m-3, a mean of 64.50 Bq·m-3 in 22 patient waiting areas (occupied by employees, patients, caretakers, and passersby), and a mean of 61.31 Bq·m-3 was achieved in 22 treatment areas. Radon density level was ranked from highest to lowest from office areas, treatment areas, and patient waiting areas. There were, however, no statistical significance achieved among the three spatial categorizations (p>0.05). We could postulate lower Radon level was achievable through frequent airing from multiple windows. Comparisons between floor levels led to the result of mean of 55.90 Bq·m-3 in the 10 areas in the basement levels, and mean of 62.31 Bq·m-3 in the 54 areas in the above ground level floors. While not achieving statistical significance (p>0.05), Radon levels were measured to be 7 Bq·m-3 lower in the basement areas compared to the above ground levels. Based on these results, we believe reducing lung cancer inducing Radon density by appropriately measuring and controlling radon concentration levels would be conducive to lowering radiation exposure to on facility employees, patients, and caretakers.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청
환경부 / 2010 / 실내 라돈 저감 가이드라인 google schola EPA / 1988 / Radon Reduction Techniques for Detached House. EPA-625-5-87-019 google schola EPA / 1996 / Technical Basis for a Candidate Building Materials Radium Standard. EPA 600-R-96-022 google schola EPA / 2003 / Assessment of radon risk in home. EPA 402-R-03-003 google schola EPA / 2010 / Consumer's Guide to Radon Reduction. EPA 402-K-10/002 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0