메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이화연 (충남대학교) 정원준 (충남대학교) 이원석 (충남대학교) 유인술 (충남대학교) 김승환 (충남대학교) 유승 (충남대학교) 이장영 (을지대학교)
저널정보
대한응급의학회 대한응급의학회지 대한응급의학회지 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
192 - 199 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Informed consent is a basic standard of care for all patients undergoing invasive procedures, but the effectiveness of consent form describing risks of procedures in a way that minimizes anxiety and maximizes recall of information is often poor. This study was designed to compare level of understanding and recall of information between patients receiving visual aid assisted informed consent and those administered written consent only. Methods: A sample population was randomized into two groups to receive one of two information delivery methods. The intervention group was presented visual aids explaining the procedure. The control group received information from physicians with written consent in the traditional manner. After the education sessions, all participants completed a questionnaire including a 9-question knowledge measurement section and were asked to grade there satisfaction level on 4-point scale. Mean scores, agreement and satisfaction levels were compared to assess whether the informed consent with visual aids was superior to standard written consent. Statistical analysis employed Student’s ttest, and the chi-square test with significance levels at a pvalue of <0.05. Results: Of the 100 individuals enrolled, 50 were randomized to the visual aids group. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the visual aids group (76.4±11.1) than in the written consent group (50.9±15.1, p=0.00), and the visual aid group expressed greater satisfaction with their education than did the written consent group (74.5±14.7 versus 49.0 ±20.8, p=0.00). The proportion of agreement was also higher in the visual aid group than in the written consent group (p=0.00). Conclusion: The use of visual aids in explaining central venous catheterization yielded higher knowledge scores and satisfaction levels than did traditional written informed consent.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0