메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경희대학교 법학연구소 경희법학 경희법학 제41권 제2호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
109 - 146 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The unfair labor practice prohibition has originated in the USA. Korean remedy system for unfair labor practice was received from japanese labor union act which imported the unfair labor practice prohibition from the USA. Korean Legal System, especially the korean labor constitution is quite different the USA's. The korean constitution is explicitly guaranteeing the right to organization, collective bargaining and collective action for the worker, but the constitution of the USA isn't. Therefore, the question is how the remedy system for unfair labor practice can be justified on the korean constitutional level. This article is a result that an attempt has been made to order to find a legal dogmatical solution to the above question. The right of the worker to organize is a special liberty right for the worker. The labor union and collective labor relation regulation act is not based on the art. 33 par. I, but on the art. 37 par. II in the constitutional law. It is by the labor union and collective labor relation regulation act that the prohibition of employer's unfair labor practice was established in order to balance worker's right with employer's.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0