메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
홍영미 (경희대학교)
저널정보
중국근현대사학회 중국근현대사연구 中國近現代史硏究 第92輯
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
1 - 21 (21page)
DOI
10.29323/mchina.2021.12.92.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The criteria for selecting cultural relics were different between the Qing Dynasty, the Beiyang Government, and the Nanjing National Government, and there were also differences in their perceptions and attitudes toward the selected cultural relics. The ruling power gave legitimacy to antiques and historic sites that were advantageous to maintaining power by being involved in the selection and utilization of cultural relics through laws and administrative bodies.
With the bureaucratic reform of the late Qing Dynasty, the Ministry of Civil affairs and Ministry of Education took in charge of the managing of antiques and ruins. They strived to change the public"s perception of cultural relics by promulgating the first modern related regulations, but to no avail. In the early days of the Republic of China, the Beiyang government succeeded the Qing Dynasty and was in charge of cultural affairs at the Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Education. Although feuds continued due to the inconsistent division of duties, the specific regulations regarding the objects of protection helped to change the perception that cultural relics were public goods rather than the private property of the emperor"s family. However, the Beiyang government frequently damaged cultural relics in the process of using publicity for political propaganda, revealing lack of awareness of cultural relics protection itself.
The Nanjing National Government pursued the specialization of laws and institutions related to cultural relics on the basis of modernization, thereby forming an institutional framework for the protection and management of cultural relics. Although the central government was in charge of managing cultural relics, they were interconnected with local governments to change the perception of cultural relics and expand their social importance when necessary. The eagerness of the Nanjing National Government in the management of cultural relics during this period was highlighted because of the specialization of related laws and institutions. However, it is also the result of political calculations that intentionally link cultural relics with “tradition” or “nation” and further link with the government’s legitimacy.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 법규와 기구의 근대화
Ⅲ. 법규와 기구의 전문화
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-912-000211795