지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 21 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2021.12.92.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The criteria for selecting cultural relics were different between the Qing Dynasty, the Beiyang Government, and the Nanjing National Government, and there were also differences in their perceptions and attitudes toward the selected cultural relics. The ruling power gave legitimacy to antiques and historic sites that were advantageous to maintaining power by being involved in the selection and utilization of cultural relics through laws and administrative bodies.
With the bureaucratic reform of the late Qing Dynasty, the Ministry of Civil affairs and Ministry of Education took in charge of the managing of antiques and ruins. They strived to change the public"s perception of cultural relics by promulgating the first modern related regulations, but to no avail. In the early days of the Republic of China, the Beiyang government succeeded the Qing Dynasty and was in charge of cultural affairs at the Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Education. Although feuds continued due to the inconsistent division of duties, the specific regulations regarding the objects of protection helped to change the perception that cultural relics were public goods rather than the private property of the emperor"s family. However, the Beiyang government frequently damaged cultural relics in the process of using publicity for political propaganda, revealing lack of awareness of cultural relics protection itself.
The Nanjing National Government pursued the specialization of laws and institutions related to cultural relics on the basis of modernization, thereby forming an institutional framework for the protection and management of cultural relics. Although the central government was in charge of managing cultural relics, they were interconnected with local governments to change the perception of cultural relics and expand their social importance when necessary. The eagerness of the Nanjing National Government in the management of cultural relics during this period was highlighted because of the specialization of related laws and institutions. However, it is also the result of political calculations that intentionally link cultural relics with “tradition” or “nation” and further link with the government’s legitimacy.
With the bureaucratic reform of the late Qing Dynasty, the Ministry of Civil affairs and Ministry of Education took in charge of the managing of antiques and ruins. They strived to change the public"s perception of cultural relics by promulgating the first modern related regulations, but to no avail. In the early days of the Republic of China, the Beiyang government succeeded the Qing Dynasty and was in charge of cultural affairs at the Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Education. Although feuds continued due to the inconsistent division of duties, the specific regulations regarding the objects of protection helped to change the perception that cultural relics were public goods rather than the private property of the emperor"s family. However, the Beiyang government frequently damaged cultural relics in the process of using publicity for political propaganda, revealing lack of awareness of cultural relics protection itself.
The Nanjing National Government pursued the specialization of laws and institutions related to cultural relics on the basis of modernization, thereby forming an institutional framework for the protection and management of cultural relics. Although the central government was in charge of managing cultural relics, they were interconnected with local governments to change the perception of cultural relics and expand their social importance when necessary. The eagerness of the Nanjing National Government in the management of cultural relics during this period was highlighted because of the specialization of related laws and institutions. However, it is also the result of political calculations that intentionally link cultural relics with “tradition” or “nation” and further link with the government’s legitimacy.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 법규와 기구의 근대화
Ⅲ. 법규와 기구의 전문화
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아 전시체제와 중국의 노동조직
중국근현대사연구
2018 .03
-
《朝鮮總督府官報》視角下1910年至1919年 日本對朝鮮殖民統治初期政策硏究
동아인문학
2025 .03
-
일본점령기 베이징의 경관 담론과 공간 정치화(1937~1941)
중국근현대사연구
2022 .09
-
‘民族經濟’와 ‘割據經濟’ ― 남경국민정부 시기 省統制經濟의 문제화 ―
동양사학연구
2021 .12
-
1950년대 北京市 基層의 ‘街道 積極分子’ : 實態와 變化
중국근현대사연구
2017 .06
-
淸末 北京 경찰기구의 통합과정 : 역사적 컨텍스트를 중심으로 본 북경 경찰의 성립
동양사학연구
2018 .09
-
16세기말 영남 관료 李庭檜의 인적 교류와 同官契의 실제
대동문화연구
2022 .06
-
朝鮮後期 詠史樂府의 협운 활용 양상에 대하여
한국한문학연구
2015 .03
-
『我邦疆域考』 역주·비평 (2) －四郡總考･樂浪考－
한국사학보
2020 .05
-
고구려의 멸망에서 나당전쟁 발발로
중국고중세사연구
2017 .05
-
현대 일본의 시민사회와 ‘센카쿠제도’
일본문화연구
2022 .10
-
李白과 李賀의 <將進酒>가 한국 한시에 끼친 영향에 관한 연구
국학연구론총
2015 .01
-
首都 北京의 州縣 행정 : 明末ㆍ淸初 京縣의 운영을 중심으로
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
中國 南京 秦淮河邊 출토 六朝時期 간독과 관련 문제
목간과문자
2018 .06
-
역사와 문화예술 공간으로서 17-18세기 ‘老北京’의 풍경
중국문학
2017 .01
-
중화인민공화국 초기의 호텔 관리 — 1950년대 베이징 서교호텔의 사례를 중심으로 —
중국근현대사연구
2021 .12
-
일제강점기 在中韓人留學生의 근대 학문?사상의 수용 - 北京지역을 중심으로 -
역사학연구
2017 .08
-
社會主義 改造와 北京의 주택 문제
동양사학연구
2015 .03
-
『北京梨園金石文字錄』의 북경희곡사료적 가치 탐색
중어중문학
2021 .06
-
1940년대의 北京 建都論과 戰後의 ‘新中國’ 구상
중국근현대사연구
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-912-000211795