지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 181 - 212 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to investigate how changing aspects of the Adversary Game at the system level between the United States (US) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) interacted with aspects of the Adversary Game between the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), in addition to aspects of the Alliance Game between the US and ROK and between the PRC and DPRK, resulting in the agreement on termination of UNC between the US and PRC in 1973.
The US and PRC agreed to dismantle the UNC for restraining their ally to reduce involvement in their respective Alliance Games and to take on a policy of rapprochement towards each other. In an Adversary Game, the US and PRC through a mutually agreed awareness of a Soviet threat and an exchange of signals expressing goodwill considered the other as a partner in maintaining the status quo. This aspect of the US-PRC détente influenced the start of ROK-DPRK dialogue. Progress in ROK-DPRK relations was not the actual improvement in relations, but rather the two countries’ responses to changes in their external environment. Thus, easing of tensions between the ROK and DPRK was delicate; not only was the US and PRC involvement in a ROK-DPRK conflict highly feasible, but such action would affect the US-PRC atmosphere of reconciliation. Furthermore, debate regarding the crises on the Korean peninsula in the UN could potentially cause ROK-DPRK relations to deteriorate. Consequently, the US in 1973 to avoid such a debate, dismantled the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea (UNCURK), and agreed with the PRC to investigate a gradually phased dismantling of the UNC in 1974. This was the result of an alliance maintenance strategy for both the US and PRC to reduce involvement in their respective Alliance Games and simultaneously maintain a soft-line policy in their Adversary Games.
The US and PRC agreed to dismantle the UNC for restraining their ally to reduce involvement in their respective Alliance Games and to take on a policy of rapprochement towards each other. In an Adversary Game, the US and PRC through a mutually agreed awareness of a Soviet threat and an exchange of signals expressing goodwill considered the other as a partner in maintaining the status quo. This aspect of the US-PRC détente influenced the start of ROK-DPRK dialogue. Progress in ROK-DPRK relations was not the actual improvement in relations, but rather the two countries’ responses to changes in their external environment. Thus, easing of tensions between the ROK and DPRK was delicate; not only was the US and PRC involvement in a ROK-DPRK conflict highly feasible, but such action would affect the US-PRC atmosphere of reconciliation. Furthermore, debate regarding the crises on the Korean peninsula in the UN could potentially cause ROK-DPRK relations to deteriorate. Consequently, the US in 1973 to avoid such a debate, dismantled the United Nations Commission for the Unification and Rehabilitation of Korea (UNCURK), and agreed with the PRC to investigate a gradually phased dismantling of the UNC in 1974. This was the result of an alliance maintenance strategy for both the US and PRC to reduce involvement in their respective Alliance Games and simultaneously maintain a soft-line policy in their Adversary Games.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 분석틀 : 적대게임과 동맹게임의 상관관계
Ⅲ. 미중 데탕트와 한반도
Ⅳ. 한국 내 유엔기구 해체 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선의 내부식민지화 극복 방안에 관한 연구
민주법학
2018 .01
-
Legal and Strategic Implications of ROK-PRC Maritime Delimitation Talks
EAI 이슈브리핑
2016 .06
-
A Power Distribution Shift between the ROK–U.S. and China–DPRK Blocs and Its Impact on Inter-Korean Relations, 1990–2021
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .05
-
人口老龄化背景下的中韩养老保障比较研究
한중사회과학연구
2023 .04
-
북중동맹 55년 평가: 한국의 전략적 함의
국방연구
2016 .01
-
The U.S. Involvement in Global Affairs and the DPRK’s Aggressions: Investigating the Association Using Statistical Analysis
JIAS
2023 .06
-
How to Make and Destroy a “Blood Alliance”? The Ups and Downs of China?DPRK Relations
Pacific Focus
2022 .04
-
Stressing the Alliance: The United States and the ROK in a Conflict with China over Taiwan
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .03
-
Cracks in the Blood-Shared Alliance? Explaining Strained PRC–DPRK Relations in the Post-ColdWar World
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
Implications of the Premodern Chinese–Korean Tributary Relationship for the South Korean Perception of ROK–PRC Ties: A South Korean Perspective*
Pacific Focus
2021 .01
-
한 · 미 및 조 · 중 연합군사지휘체제 비교 연구 : 역사적 제도주의 관점을 중심으로
아세아연구
2019 .06
-
DPRK’s Illicit Cyber Activities: Latest Developments and ROK’s Responses
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .12
-
진보적 교육학 도서에 대한 분석
사회과학연구
2016 .12
-
한중관계의 회복? : 외교 안보 분야의 쟁점, 그리고 불확실성
국제지역연구
2025 .01
-
대북제재가 북한 군사력에 미치는 영향
Journal of North Korea Studies
2017 .06
-
PRC Decision-Making Process Analysis Using AI and Senturion Predictive Model Regarding Chinese Invasion Scenario of Taiwan
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2024 .09
-
North Korea between China, Japan and the ROK, 2012–2016
Korea Journal
2018 .09
-
전망이론으로 본 한·중 관계의 경제적 강압과 안보정책 결정 영향: 사드 배치와 쿼드 가입 사례 비교
한국군사학논집
2023 .02
-
What Determines the DPRK’s Anthracite Exports to China?: Implications for the DPRK’s Economy
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2015 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
이승만 정권기 ‘한미합의의사록’의 체결과 개정
이동원
역사와현실
2018
.03
미완의 계획: 1960년대 전반기 미 행정부의 주한미군철수논의
마상윤
한국과 국제정치
2003
.06
유엔군사령부의 법적 지위와 존속 및 해체 문제에 관한 소고
이기범
서울국제법연구
2019
.12
1950･60년대 한국 안보정책의 변화와 연속성 : 베트남전쟁 파병 선제안과 파병결정의 분석을 통해
배관표
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013
.05
데탕트기 미국의 동아시아 정책과 일본의 대한안보정책 : 미국의 ‘철수’,‘ 균형’,‘ 연합’ 전략과 한일안보협력
이기태
국제정치논총
2014
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0