지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study reviews Korean Japanese learner’s acquisition of Japanese male and female related vocabulary and the native Japanese speaker’s evaluation. The major results are as follows.
(1) In terms of rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level, learner (advanced) (72.5%) was higher than learner (low)(56.0%) but the acquisition rate of both was not that high. And the rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was almost similar.
(2) In terms of rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary(30 questions) depending on learner’s level, the learner(advanced) was higher than the learner(low). However, in the case of the same vocabulary question, the correct answer rate was not similar, in particular, 男子and 彼女showed big difference.
(3) The rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was high in the order of 男性·女性(80.7%), 男の子·女の子, 男友達·女友達, 彼氏·彼女, 男子·女子, 男の人·女の人and 男·女(47.9).
(4) The numbers of wrong answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was in the order of 男子(105)·女子(134), 男性·女性, 男の人·女の人, 男·女, 男の子·女の子, 彼氏·彼女, 男友達·女友達.
(5) The rate of correct answer was low in the order of question 2(男), question 9(男の人), question 18(女), question 17(女) regardless of learner’s level.
(6) Japanese native speaker evaluated the naturalness than irritation more strictly in evaluating irritation and naturalness about the wrong answer for male and female related vocabulary, and evaluated the female vocabulary more strictly than the female vocabulary in both criteria.
(7) The question 23 which was the most strictly evaluated in irritation used 女の人·女性(right answer) as 女(wrong answer) and the question 15[彼氏(right answer)-男子(wrong answer)] and question 16[女/彼女-女子] is an example that misused 男子and 女子 respectively, which are evaluated strictly in the both criteria of irritation and naturalness.
(8) For the reason why to evaluate the irritation strictly, question 23 used 乱暴/卑下/蔑視/軽視 and question 15, 16 used 不快 for expression.
(1) In terms of rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level, learner (advanced) (72.5%) was higher than learner (low)(56.0%) but the acquisition rate of both was not that high. And the rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was almost similar.
(2) In terms of rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary(30 questions) depending on learner’s level, the learner(advanced) was higher than the learner(low). However, in the case of the same vocabulary question, the correct answer rate was not similar, in particular, 男子and 彼女showed big difference.
(3) The rate of correct answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was high in the order of 男性·女性(80.7%), 男の子·女の子, 男友達·女友達, 彼氏·彼女, 男子·女子, 男の人·女の人and 男·女(47.9).
(4) The numbers of wrong answer for male and female related vocabulary depending on learner’s level was in the order of 男子(105)·女子(134), 男性·女性, 男の人·女の人, 男·女, 男の子·女の子, 彼氏·彼女, 男友達·女友達.
(5) The rate of correct answer was low in the order of question 2(男), question 9(男の人), question 18(女), question 17(女) regardless of learner’s level.
(6) Japanese native speaker evaluated the naturalness than irritation more strictly in evaluating irritation and naturalness about the wrong answer for male and female related vocabulary, and evaluated the female vocabulary more strictly than the female vocabulary in both criteria.
(7) The question 23 which was the most strictly evaluated in irritation used 女の人·女性(right answer) as 女(wrong answer) and the question 15[彼氏(right answer)-男子(wrong answer)] and question 16[女/彼女-女子] is an example that misused 男子and 女子 respectively, which are evaluated strictly in the both criteria of irritation and naturalness.
(8) For the reason why to evaluate the irritation strictly, question 23 used 乱暴/卑下/蔑視/軽視 and question 15, 16 used 不快 for expression.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 조사 방법
3. 조사Ⅰ의 결과 및 고찰
4. 조사Ⅱ의 결과 및 고찰
5. 맺는 말
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
어휘습득의 구조적 관계 분석: 다중요인 관점으로
유아교육연구
2018 .01
-
산업어휘 습득을 위한 3단계 어휘 확장과 역할극 활용 수업 방안- 특수목적 한국어를 중심으로
한국태국학회논총
2024 .08
-
어휘능력 진단검사도구 개발 연구
청람어문교육
2024 .09
-
한국어 교육 어휘 선정과 빅데이터 활용 방안
인문사회 21
2021 .12
-
2011 특수교육 기본 교육과정 초등학교 국어 및 사회 교과서 어휘 분석
특수교육연구
2017 .12
-
A Study of Basic Vocabulary Selection for Treating First- and Second-Grade Elementary School Students With Language Disorders
언어치료연구
2020 .07
-
학술적 어휘 평가의 평가 영역과 문항 유형에 대한 이론적 검토 -맞춤형 어휘 평가 설계를 위한 기초 연구-
청람어문교육
2024 .05
-
교과 어휘의 기능 분류에 따른 교과 학습 어휘의 개념 설정 - 국어·사회과 교과서 어휘 구성 비교 분석을 중심으로 -
새국어교육
2015 .09
-
18～36개월 영아의 어휘검사 목록 구성을 위한 제안
한국영유아보육학
2020 .07
-
중급 한국어 어휘 교재 개발을 위한 기초 연구
한국어문교육
2016 .01
-
어휘교육의 ‘내용 체계’ 개발을 위한 과제 고찰 및 교육과정 검토 - 2022 개정 국어과 공통 교육과정을 중심으로 -
문법교육
2024 .04
-
한국어 사고어휘의 평정 및 등급화 방안 탐색
인문사회 21
2021 .08
-
기초 문식성 단계 학습자의 ‘우연한 어휘 학습’을 위한 교과서 수록 어휘 분석
초등교육연구
2024 .01
-
의미 연결망에 기반한 어휘 중재가 단순언어장애 아동의 어휘 학습에 미치는 영향
Communication Sciences and Disorders
2022 .12
-
국내 학습부진 및 학습장애 관련 연구에서 활용한 어휘검사의 현황 및 특성 분석
특수교육
2019 .05
-
Python을 활용한 어휘 학습 프로그램 구성 방안
청람어문교육
2018 .01
-
재한중국인 가정 아동의 한국어 습득에 관한 연구 -발음과 어휘를 중심으로-
한국어 교육
2018 .01
-
3-5세 유아의 정서어휘 표현에 관한 연구
언어치료연구
2022 .01
-
2015 개정 중국어 교육과정의 기본어휘와 新HSK 3급 어휘 비교 연구
외국어교육연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0