메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김유진 (부산대학교) 이정우 (경희대학교) 이재열 (부산대학교)
저널정보
대한치과의사협회 대한치과의사협회지 대한치과의사협회지 Vol.60 No.10(Wn.640)
발행연도
2022.9
수록면
638 - 647 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the methods through computer-assisted simulation surgery and surgical guide production in mandibular reconstruction using the fibula and the existing traditional method. From February 2021 to July 2022, 10 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy at our hospital for two years were evaluated for operation time and reconstruction time. 10 patients underwent segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction using a surgical guide prepared in advance through 3D analysis. In addition, we compared and analyzed 5 patients who had undergone surgery by the conventional method. In segmental mandibulectomy using a surgical guide, the average operating time was 443.50 minutes with the standard deviation (SD): 88.696, and the average reconstruction time was 64.90 minutes with the standard deviation: 11.377. The average operation time using the conventional method was 517.00 minutes with the standard deviation (SD): 83.86, the average reconstruction time 77.80 minutes with the standard deviation (SD): 8.075. When the average operation time was compared, the p-value was 0.148, which was not statistically significant. In the comparison of the average reconstruction times, the p-value was 0.0425, which was statistically significant. In conclusion, it was found that in the case of mandibular reconstruction using the fibula, the operation time was shortened along with the decrease of the time in the reconstruction. The operation time in the conventional method was longer than that of the surgical guide method.

목차

ABSTRACT
I. 서론(Introduction)
II. 연구방법(Materials and Methods)
III. 연구성적(Reults)
IV. 총괄 및 고안(Discussion)
V. 결론(Conclusions)
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-515-000149640