개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 85 - 102 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.24285/CLER.2022.11.38.85
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Some high-priced ice cream stung people’s wallets this summer when they were only discovered at the checkout. The netizens called it “xuegaocike” and many expressions of “Xcike” were born. This paper studies the emerging Internet popular construction “Xcike” from the aspects of construction determination, semantic classification, pragmatics, and causes.
According to Goldberg’s definition of construction and Chunhong Shi’s general understanding of construction, the meaning and form of “Xcike” cannot be deduced by people’s existing knowledge. At the same time, many forms of “Xcike” also prove that this form has been supplemented and normalized, so this form can be identified as a construction.
After summarizing, the variable “X” in “Xcike” can be divided into three categories. It also has the process of transforming from grammatical construction to rhetorical construction. “Xcike” expresses the subjective attitude and opinion of the speaker, so the constructional meaning of “Xcike” is expressed in the subjective and evaluative sense. The pragmatic function of “Xcike” is a subjective evaluation function, and the pragmatic effect is also reflected in three aspects: negative, positive and neutral.
By observing the generation and evolution of the “Xcike” construction, the reasons for the construction are mainly reflected in four aspects: First, construction coercion. Second, memetics. Third, the mechanism of metaphor and metonymy. Fourth, the psychological impact of the public.
According to Goldberg’s definition of construction and Chunhong Shi’s general understanding of construction, the meaning and form of “Xcike” cannot be deduced by people’s existing knowledge. At the same time, many forms of “Xcike” also prove that this form has been supplemented and normalized, so this form can be identified as a construction.
After summarizing, the variable “X” in “Xcike” can be divided into three categories. It also has the process of transforming from grammatical construction to rhetorical construction. “Xcike” expresses the subjective attitude and opinion of the speaker, so the constructional meaning of “Xcike” is expressed in the subjective and evaluative sense. The pragmatic function of “Xcike” is a subjective evaluation function, and the pragmatic effect is also reflected in three aspects: negative, positive and neutral.
By observing the generation and evolution of the “Xcike” construction, the reasons for the construction are mainly reflected in four aspects: First, construction coercion. Second, memetics. Third, the mechanism of metaphor and metonymy. Fourth, the psychological impact of the public.
목차
Ⅰ. 绪论
Ⅱ. “X刺客”的构式判定
Ⅲ. “X刺客”构式的分析
Ⅳ. 总结
参考文献
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
객, 월, 민 방언과 조선한자음의 [-m] 운미 비교
중국조선어문
2016 .01
-
준접사 ‘客’에 대한 연구
한중언어문화연구
2017 .08
-
Constructing a Vocabulary List of English Textbooks in Semantics and Pragmatics
영어학
2020 .03
-
The “Concealed Passive” Construction Needs Investigating Diachronically
언어학 연구
2018 .04
-
의미론의 어제와 오늘
한국어학
2018 .11
-
통사부와 의미/화용부의 연결고리로서의 의미역
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
고려 말 조선 초 토지제도 개혁과 사회 변화
역사비평
2017 .08
-
텍스트마이닝을 활용한 중국어 구문 연구 동향 분석
담화와인지
2023 .05
-
국내 구문문법 연구의 구문 의미 관련 쟁점 검토
한국어학
2019 .08
-
중국인 학습자를 위한 부사 ‘더’에 관한 연구
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
현대중국어 존현구문과 관련구문들 간의 관계 연구
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
認知意味論的観点から見た日本語の中間構文の研究
일어일문학연구
2019 .01
-
网络自媒体谐音表意的动因及语用分析——以朝鲜向韩国投放垃圾气球事件为中心
한중언어문화연구
2024 .08
-
‘好+V’ 구문에 관한 소고? ‘好+V’ 구문과 ‘起?’ 구문의 대칭과 비대칭
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
한국어 의미 연구와 의미 이론
한글
2016 .09
-
Current Trends and Prospects of Semantics-Pragmatics Research
언어와언어학
2023 .05
-
意味地図はヴォイス形式の対照分析に有効なのか －日韓両語の場合－
日本語敎育
2024 .09
-
“（是）……的”句中“的”与宾语的位置关系 --以“S(是)AVO的”和“S(是)AV的O”句式为主
중국언어연구
2022 .02
-
동태존재구문에 대한 인지적 접근
중국어문논총
2016 .02
-
The Variable Use of a Pragmatic Marker, Please
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-720-000299573