지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제126호
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 105 - 135 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.12.126.105
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article is how both South and North Koreas perceived and responded to the concept of Neutralism, which emerged all around the globe after the Korean War. Analyzed in particular is rather ‘symmetrical responses’ displayed by both South and North Korean governments, to global events that occurred in the wake of such ideology emerging in the 1950s, such as the Bandung Conference in 1955, Austria’s Neutralization and Unification during the same year, the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and the drafting of the first version of the Yugoslav Communist Alliance Code in 1958.
Research shows that both South and North Korean governments responded rather symmetrically toward the Asian and African regions where Neutralism prevailed(as we can see from the Bandung Conference), the Free World(as in the case of Austria), and the Communist realm(as in cases of Hungary and Yugoslavia), during the Cold War of the 1950s. Their such responses varied, depending on whether they could benefit from the effects of supporting neutrality.
Previous studies of the Cold War History, either from Korean scholars or from scholars abroad, have concentrated on the relations between ‘Central regions,’ or relations between regions which were rather ‘Central’ while the other was mostly categorized ‘Peripheral.’ Attempted in this work conversely is to define and determine the relationship between regions that could both be considered as ‘Peripheries.’ It should be noted that South and North Koreas have together formed one of the last front-lines of the Cold War on the Korean peninsula which has always been perceived as a ‘Peripheral region,’ and that other countries which declared Neutralism in the hope of escaping clutches of the polarizing nature of the Cold War order were also such peripheries.
Research shows that both South and North Korean governments responded rather symmetrically toward the Asian and African regions where Neutralism prevailed(as we can see from the Bandung Conference), the Free World(as in the case of Austria), and the Communist realm(as in cases of Hungary and Yugoslavia), during the Cold War of the 1950s. Their such responses varied, depending on whether they could benefit from the effects of supporting neutrality.
Previous studies of the Cold War History, either from Korean scholars or from scholars abroad, have concentrated on the relations between ‘Central regions,’ or relations between regions which were rather ‘Central’ while the other was mostly categorized ‘Peripheral.’ Attempted in this work conversely is to define and determine the relationship between regions that could both be considered as ‘Peripheries.’ It should be noted that South and North Koreas have together formed one of the last front-lines of the Cold War on the Korean peninsula which has always been perceived as a ‘Peripheral region,’ and that other countries which declared Neutralism in the hope of escaping clutches of the polarizing nature of the Cold War order were also such peripheries.
목차
머리말
1. 아시아･아프리카 발(發) 중립 : 반둥회의
2. 서유럽 발(發) 중립 : 오스트리아의 중립화통일
3. 동유럽 발(發) 중립
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제3세계 운동의 기원으로서 한국전쟁 - 버마의 우 누의 중립주의를 연결고리로
역사비평
2022 .02
-
냉전의 예외와 규칙 : 냉전사를 통해 본 한국 현대사
역사비평
2015 .02
-
1950년대 후반 냉전의 균열과 한국·터키의 문화외교
역사와현실
2022 .12
-
중국근현대사 연구 50년의 성과와 과제
동양사학연구
2015 .12
-
사상심리전의 텍스트로서 한국전쟁 : 자유세계로의 확산과 동아시아적 귀환
역사비평
2017 .02
-
A Comparison of South Korean and Japanese Responses to Changes in the International Order after the Post-Cold War Era
Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies
2015 .12
-
1956년 헝가리 사태에 대한 남한의 인식과 대응
역사비평
2017 .05
-
냉전의 오리엔탈리즘 비판과 탈식민적 냉전 연구
시대와 철학
2024 .09
-
North Korea’s Third World Policy during the Cold War: Light and Darkness
Korea Journal
2023 .03
-
냉전 시기 소련-북한의 비대칭동맹과 북한의 자주외교
슬라브硏究
2019 .01
-
Not Yet Post-Cold War Era : A Genealogical Search for the Cold War Discursive Infrastructure in Counter-Jongbuk Surveillance Politics
Korea Journal
2018 .12
-
1950년대 북한의 반둥회의와 비동맹운동 인식 : 잡지 『국제생활』 기사를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
‘정사’ 대 ‘비사’ - 1950년대 미국의 6·25전쟁사 연구와 냉전문화
역사비평
2020 .05
-
독일 냉전사 연구의 관점과 주제들
역사비평
2015 .05
-
1990년대 초 한국인들의 대미 인식에 영향을 미친 요인들
역사교육논집
2015 .01
-
구식 냉전연구와 신식 냉전사 ―세르히 플로히의 『얄타』와 오드 아르네 베스타의 『냉전의 지구사』
역사비평
2021 .02
-
북한의 남북한 당국간 회담 선제안 행태 분석-김정일·김정은 시대 비교
동아인문학
2025 .03
-
해류, 명태 그리고 NLL - 동해 명태 회유로의 이동과 남북한 냉전 -
역사와현실
2020 .12
-
헝가리혁명의 수용과 냉전인식의 동요:제 3세계적 상상력과 ‘평화-혁명’
구보학보
2020 .01
-
How South Koreans Interpreted Modern China : South Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History during the Cold War Era
Korea Journal
2018 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0