메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영석 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국예이츠학회 한국 예이츠 저널 한국 예이츠 저널 제67권
발행연도
2022.4
수록면
1 - 16 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay furst attempts to study in the main two major publications: one is R.F. Foster’s great biographical work and the other David Pierce’s good book, which is scholarly and looks beautiful as well, and then will ask a question: what’s the purpose of these books? What does Yeats really look for: perfection of a life or art? We now have excellent biographical and critical works of Yeats and his work. We have scholars and biographers and poets that could have their say in the matter of Yeats’s life and/or work. Of them, Richard Ellmann seems to be the strongest biographer scholar who could both look into Yeats and his work, and feel what Yeats’s work is; R.F. Foster’s unique eye as a historian helps our eye look into what Yeats has done in his life; T.R. Henn’s approach, for example, seems straightforward as he deals with Yeats as poet and with his poems in depth without going astray very much. Other biographers and scholars have works as valuable as the three above. I would also like to deal with some scholars writing and editing Yeats’s poems as their needs arise. Some, however, seem to have bent and cut Yeats’s poems to fit them into their purposes, without knowing what harm this could do Yeats and his poetry, which. I would point to. My aim here is not that I serve as a judge of their work, but would like to put Yeats’s work into a proper dimension. Yeats as Modern poet seems to have been misunderstood or underestimated as Modern poet, when we label him as a Last Romantic, the term Yeats himself has first coined.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0