메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
하승완 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제30권 제4호
발행연도
2020.11
수록면
547 - 565 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A fair amount of attention has been paid in previous literature to the asymmetry of the appearance of complementizer ‘that’ in subordinate clauses. In this paper, we will begin with critical reviews on the recent previous literature that attempts to account for the so-called that-trace and anti-that-trace effects. Appealing to the Split C-domain, Spec-to-Spec Anti-locality, and Dynamic Phases, the previous analyses were able to capture why ‘that’ cannot appear when a wh-operator moves from subject position of the complement clause, but the complementizer must appear in subject relative clauses. However, they were unable to account for why anti-that-trace effects are not observed when wh-operators extract out of the object position in both types of clauses. To be more specific, they fail to explain why ‘that’ can be optional in object relative clauses. To explain the lack of anti-thattrace effects, I argue that a phrase that is contained within a phase is still active and can be probed by a higher head. That is, the case feature of object wh-operator in phase edge position is checked but still active, and establishes an Agree relation with C (Pesetsky and Torrego 2001). This triggers the case feature on the C head to be checked by the operator DP, which, in turn, bans on T-to-C movement. Consequently, it leads to no overt complementizer in object relatives.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0