메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최태훈 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국중국언어학회 중국언어연구 중국언어연구 제95호
발행연도
2021.8
수록면
269 - 300 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research using critical discourse analysis examines the response strategies of the Global Times editorials, which clearly reveals the Chinese government’s ideological strategies and tactics against US which uses Uyghur human rights issues as glue to alliance solidarity since Biden took power. The related editorials have constructed a counter-hegemonic ideology against US. First, China urges Russia and developing countries to establish an anti-US coalitions because US violates basic human rights such as safety and life protection of its people caused by the COVID-19, gun violence, racism and natural disasters. Second, western political human rights cannot be applied to developing countries such as China since the basic concept of human rights in developing countries such as China is ‘fighting poverty.’ Such a confrontation between US and China over rights abuses has quickly turned around before and after the sanctions by US, EU, Britain, and Canada on Mar. 22, 2021 over the abuse of Uyghurs, resulting in boycotting Xinjiang cotton by multinational enterprises. The editorials before the sanctions phase expanded the current situation from “human rights debate” and “human rights game” to “media war.” However, the editorials after the sanctions quickly turned the previous “human rights war” into “the hegemonic war.” Furthermore, they instigated the entire people to join the fight in “People’s War” against US.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0