메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
손석의 (서울대학교 국제대학원) 조비연 (서울대학교)
저널정보
서강대학교 동아연구소 동아연구 동아연구 제36권 제1호
발행연도
2017.2
수록면
103 - 137 (35page)
DOI
10.33334/sieas.2017.36.1.103

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recent developments in Japan’s right of collective self-defense and ‘comfort women’ issues have often been attributed to PM Abe’s political agenda, historical revisionism, and Japan’s overall ‘rightward tilt’ in the 2010s. By resuming to Japan’s parliamentary debates (domestic elites) in the 1990s on these two issues, however, this article argues that such perspective is prone to overlook how these issues have been intricately connected to Japan’s ‘reconstruction’ of its national strategic identity in the post-Cold War era. Excavating the link between Japan’s historical revisionism and its efforts to newly consolidate its security posture in the post-Cold War setting, this article finds that the seemingly ‘revisionist’ and ‘self-contradictory’ changes in Japan’s approach to the right of collective self-defense and ‘comfort women’ issues are better understood from the point of Japan’s strategic quest towards security. The central arguments of this paper are: 1) Japan’s domestic debates on the right of collective self-defense and apology diplomacy in the 1990s symbolize Japan’s quest for new strategic identity in the post-Cold War setting; 2) specifically, the ‘idea’ of transition from US-USSR bipolarity to the ‘UN-centered’ world order played a critical role in bringing about Japan’s efforts to renew its postwar pacifist identity and apology diplomacy in the early 1990s; 3) yet, such backbone of the post-Cold War identity was watered down as US-centered security order regained prominence in the late 1990s, attenuating the rationale behind Japan’s pacifism and apology diplomacy on the issues of the right of collective self-defense and ‘comfort women’; 4) overall, Japan’s vacillation between the UN-centered security posture and the reliance on the US-Japan alliance determined the changes in Japan’s approach to the two contentious issues.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0