지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2021.2
- 수록면
- 72 - 85 (14page)
- DOI
- 10.1177/1879366521999899
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The newly minted concept of the “Indo-Pacific Region” (IPR) is generally seen as a response by the United States and its allies to China’s growing influence in strategically important areas of the Pacific and Indian oceans. However, the view of IPR as a single (U.S.-led) anti-Beijing front is simplistic and misleading, obscuring a variety of approaches by the region’s states. New Delhi has a strong tradition of non-alignment, whereas Tokyo is more interested in rules that restrict unilateral actions not only by China but also by other regional players, including the United States. Australian business is very cautious about frictions in trade relations with China. Beijing views the growing military activity of the United States off its shores, including in the South China Sea, as a threat to regional stability. According to the authoritative Chinese sources, the Indo-Pacific strategy of Donald Trump is part of broader efforts to prevent China from becoming a dominant regional and global power. At the same time, the development of Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) understanding of the Indo-Pacific region is less of a concern to Beijing, as the South-East Asian countries interested in balancing China and the United States are unlikely to fully join the fight against the “authoritarian threat.” As for Russia, it unequivocally rejects the military/power-based U.S. version of the IPR concept and is more amenable to flexible versions promoted by other players, such as Tokyo’s multilateral vision for the Indo-Pacific Region. In the end, the final response of Russia and China to IPR will thus be determined not only by U.S. actions but also by the behavior of other regional powers.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (75)
참고문헌 신청
Administration of the President of the Russian Federation / Vladimir Putin vy`stupil na itogovoj plenarnoj sessii XVI zasedaniya Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valdaj» [Vladimir Putin addressed the final plenary session of the 16th meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club]
Banyan / India-China relations and the media. Blame the Messenger / The Economist
Brown, D. / «Poyas i Put`» po-yaponski. Chto daet Rossii konkurenciya proektov Yaponii i Kitaya v Azii [“Belt and Road” in Japanese. What does the competition between Japanese and Chinese projects in Asia gives Russia?]
Chaudhury, D. R. / India, Japan & Australia firm up partnership for free and open Indo-Pacific Region / Economic Times
Chen, B. / 2015 / Discussion on the “Indo-Pacific Era” and China’s strategic response / Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review 2:51~65
Banyan / India-China relations and the media. Blame the Messenger / The Economist
Brown, D. / «Poyas i Put`» po-yaponski. Chto daet Rossii konkurenciya proektov Yaponii i Kitaya v Azii [“Belt and Road” in Japanese. What does the competition between Japanese and Chinese projects in Asia gives Russia?]
Chaudhury, D. R. / India, Japan & Australia firm up partnership for free and open Indo-Pacific Region / Economic Times
Chen, B. / 2015 / Discussion on the “Indo-Pacific Era” and China’s strategic response / Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review 2:51~65
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
India's Indo‐Pacific Strategy: A Pragmatic Balancing between the United States and China
Pacific Focus
2021 .01
-
Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and its Implications for Bilateral Cooperation between India and South Korea
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2023 .07
-
Indonesia Must Lead in the Indo-Pacific Region
Global Asia
2018 .09
-
트럼프 행정부 인도·태평양 전략의 문제점과 향후 전망
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
-
Helping the US Lead Again: Japan’s Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2021 .03
-
Japan’s Changing Vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2019 .03
-
미국과 중국의 “인도-태평양 전략”과 패권 경쟁
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2018 .01
-
The Indo-Pacific Strategy and Japanese Diplomacy
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .01
-
The Taiwan Strait and the ROK–U.S. Alliance
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .03
-
Canada’s Indo-Pacific Future: Time for a Long-Term Strategy
Global Asia
2022 .06
-
Introduction Middle-Power Agency in an Indo-Pacific Era
Global Asia
2023 .09
-
Korea’s ‘Economy-Security Strategy’ and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .08
-
Asia-Pacific vs. Indo-Pacific: Paradigm Shift or False Choice?
Global Asia
2023 .09
-
US Alliances and Trump’s ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’ Policy
Global Asia
2017 .12
-
Intellectual Property as National Security: The Case of AI in the Indo-Pacific
Global Asia
2022 .12
-
Comparison of U.S., Japan and EU’s Indo-Pacific Strategies, with a Focus on Development Cooperation
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
2022 .03
-
ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific: Assessment and Implications for South Korea
IFANS FOCUS
2019 .12
-
The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and Geoeconomics
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .04
-
China Rising and the Emerging Carrier Arms Race in the Indo–Pacific: Strategic Competition and Balance of Power
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2023 .05
-
The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Implications for South Korea
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0