지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.5
- 수록면
- 3 - 31 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2023.5.34.2.3
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As the need to reduce carbon emissions due to climate change is raised, it is necessary to find energy sources with low carbon emissions. With the increase in global energy consumption, there is a reason to diversify energy sources, and in terms of energy security, new energy sources should be discovered in addition to traditional energy sources. Our legislation ostensibly has several systems in terms of promoting the development, use, and dissemination of renewable energy. However, in reality, there are problems with the legal system and fairness in operation. In fact, the Korea Power Exchange can exercise its power grid management authority arbitrarily, so there is a risk of substantive competition in the energy market, despite the introduction of a competition system in the power generation sector. As a result, in reality, the Korea Power Exchange is implementing a compulsory power generation curtailment on wind power generation, which is practically dominant.
Rather than organically managing the entire energy ecosystem, Korea"s energy legislation focuses on the electricity business and the electricity market to regulate the efficient and stable supply of energy. In other words, it can be said that a discourse that overly emphasizes stability and efficiency dominates our energy legislation. From the perspective of the Energy Environment Act, it is necessary not only to shift the ecosystem to renewable energy, but also to expand the perspective of diversification of energy sources in terms of energy supply stability. First, in order to ensure fair and transparent access for each power generation company to the transmission and distribution network, an institutional approach that can enforce the principle of network neutrality in the energy sector – that is, the equal access right to the transmission or distribution network of energy producers - can be considered. Second, a strategy to institutionalize power grid management based on data is also needed. If accurate prediction of energy demand and production using ICT-based new technology is made, power grid operation based on clear evidence is expected to be possible. Third, a method of institutionalizing technical measures such as synchronous ancestors and ESS(Energy Storage System) can also be considered. By suggesting a target for carbon emission reduction and legally obligating the use of synchronous condenser to achieve it, it is possible to consider a way to partially intervene in the market situation.
The system does not support the technological development related to renewable energy, and rather, there is a problem of shrinking the production of electricity based on renewable energy due to excessive output limitation. Therefore, there is a need for a power market management plan suitable for Korea"s energy and market conditions. It cannot be said that this article provides the perfect answer for the future of the energy ecosystem, including the expansion of supply and demand for renewable energy. It is essential to rationally establish the governance of the renewable energy ecosystem in terms of responding to climate change and pursuing diversification of energy supply. This is not a structure that imposes unreasonable obligations on operators in a specific area, but aims to create a basis for future legal discussions to create a balanced and fair energy ecosystem.
Rather than organically managing the entire energy ecosystem, Korea"s energy legislation focuses on the electricity business and the electricity market to regulate the efficient and stable supply of energy. In other words, it can be said that a discourse that overly emphasizes stability and efficiency dominates our energy legislation. From the perspective of the Energy Environment Act, it is necessary not only to shift the ecosystem to renewable energy, but also to expand the perspective of diversification of energy sources in terms of energy supply stability. First, in order to ensure fair and transparent access for each power generation company to the transmission and distribution network, an institutional approach that can enforce the principle of network neutrality in the energy sector – that is, the equal access right to the transmission or distribution network of energy producers - can be considered. Second, a strategy to institutionalize power grid management based on data is also needed. If accurate prediction of energy demand and production using ICT-based new technology is made, power grid operation based on clear evidence is expected to be possible. Third, a method of institutionalizing technical measures such as synchronous ancestors and ESS(Energy Storage System) can also be considered. By suggesting a target for carbon emission reduction and legally obligating the use of synchronous condenser to achieve it, it is possible to consider a way to partially intervene in the market situation.
The system does not support the technological development related to renewable energy, and rather, there is a problem of shrinking the production of electricity based on renewable energy due to excessive output limitation. Therefore, there is a need for a power market management plan suitable for Korea"s energy and market conditions. It cannot be said that this article provides the perfect answer for the future of the energy ecosystem, including the expansion of supply and demand for renewable energy. It is essential to rationally establish the governance of the renewable energy ecosystem in terms of responding to climate change and pursuing diversification of energy supply. This is not a structure that imposes unreasonable obligations on operators in a specific area, but aims to create a basis for future legal discussions to create a balanced and fair energy ecosystem.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 에너지 관련 법제 현황
Ⅲ. 에너지 법제와 거버넌스의 문제점
Ⅳ. 에너지 생태계 개선을 위한 대안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국의 재생 에너지 확대 및 지원정책 연구
토지주택연구
2018 .07
-
Problems and Adjustments of Renewable Energy Legislation in China
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2017 .11
-
남북 재생에너지 협력을 위한 전략과 정책적 과제
환경법과 정책
2018 .09
-
Assessing Alternative Renewable Energy Policies in Korea’s Electricity Market
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2019 .11
-
2050 탄소중립의 실현을 위한 신재생에너지법제의 개선방안
저스티스
2022 .06
-
Comparative Analysis of Japan and Korea’s Renewable Energy Politics: 2002-2016
사회과학연구
2018 .04
-
India's New and Renewable Energy Market: Opportunities and Challenges
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2022 .09
-
Analysis of India's New and Renewable Energy Market and Policies and Implications for Korea-India Cooperation
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2023 .02
-
인도의 신·재생에너지 시장 및 정책 분석과 한-인도 협력 방안
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2022 .12
-
재생에너지 입지정책 도입의 의미와 과제
환경법연구
2018 .01
-
재생에너지 법정책의 현황과 개선과제
환경법연구
2017 .01
-
중국 재생에너지 정책담론 확산 연구: 빅데이터 분석을 중심으로
중국연구
2017 .01
-
신재생에너지의 환경적 영향에 관한 법적 고찰
환경법연구
2015 .01
-
동적 패널 모형을 이용한 재생에너지 정책의 OECD 국가 재생에너지 보급 효과 분석
자원환경경제연구
2016 .01
-
Analyzing the Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Renewable Energy Production and Carbon Emissions by Using Panel VECM and VAR Models
무역연구
2020 .01
-
전력부문 외국인 투자(FDI)가 신재생에너지 생산량에 미치는 장, 단기적 영향분석: 패널백터오차수정모형을 이용한 분석*
무역연구
2019 .01
-
탈원전･탈석탄･신재생 에너지 확대 정책에 따른 신규 전원구성의 수급 안정성 평가
에너지경제연구
2018 .03
-
유럽연합 신재생에너지 정책상의 주요 과제들로 본 정책 발전 방향에 관한 소고 : 소비 분야 중심으로
유럽연구
2018 .05
-
신·재생에너지 활성화를 위한 전기소매사업자에 대한 법적과제 : 일본의 사례를 중심으로
환경법과 정책
2017 .02
-
에너지 패러다임 전환 궤도: 브라질 전력산업 편입의 함의
라틴아메리카연구
2022 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-360-001742406