지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 동향자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.2
- 수록면
- 1 - 7 (0page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We use the Trade Agreements Provisions on Electronic Commerce and Data and their corresponding texts to undertake network and text analysis on trade agreements with digital trade chapters to identify which countries are important in the network and how similar or different their texts of digital trade chapters are. centrality values reflect which countries are influential in the network, while values of similarity assess the level of similarity between the texts of digital trade chapters concluded by these countries. Centrality and similarity are complementary in assessing the relative positions of countries in the network, where the number of linkages between countries is significant in centrality and the quality of digital trade chapters is critical in similarity. We interpret this to mean that a country with a high degree of centrality is likely to be a rule-promoter in the network, whereas a country with a high degree of similarity is likely to be a rule-maker. The brief highlights three key findings from network and text analysis of digital trade agreements: (1) The U.S. has been the best rule-maker but not the best rule-promoter, whereas Singapore has been the best rule-promoter but not the best rule-maker. (2) China is a rule-maker, but to a weaker extent than the U.S., and Korea is a rule-promoter, although it is less active than Singapore. (3) Japan and Australia have served as both rule-makers and rule-promoters. Identification of countries’ relative positions in the network of digital trade agreements would be useful at the start of talks on digital trade policy.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Estimating the Economic Impact of Digital Trade Agreement
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2024 .07
-
아·태지역 디지털 무역 관련 지역무역협정을 통한 규범화 발전 동향과 평가
무역학회지
2021 .08
-
디지털무역 자유화를 위한 지역무역협정의 성과와 과제
무역연구
2019 .01
-
Comparative Analysis of the Digital Trade Agreements
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2022 .08
-
일본의 의무적 공개매수제도
증권법연구
2017 .04
-
New rules for the digital economy and multilateral cooperation
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2020 .03
-
Digital Trade Rules in the Asia-Pacific Region:Fragmentation of Rules and the Way Forward
IFANS PERSPECTIVES
2022 .01
-
Major Digital Trade Agreements and the Implications for the Korea-Singapore Digital Partnership Agreement (DPA)
무역연구
2020 .01
-
The Challenges of Adapting Trade Policies to the Digital Era
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2022 .01
-
Issues of Digital Trade Rules and Implications for Korea in the Post COVID-19 World
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
2020 .09
-
A Comparative Study of Consumer Trust in Major Digital Trade Agreements
무역연구
2021 .01
-
Digital Trade in China and Its Implications
KIET Industrial Economic Review
2020 .12
-
Evolving Digital and E-Commerce Trade Rules for Northeast Asia
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
Evolving Digital and E-Commerce Trade Rules for Northeast Asia
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2016 .12
-
Applying Competition Policy to Optimize International Trade Rules
[KIEP] KIEP Staff Papers
2017 .02
-
Promoting Trade Diplomacy through Digital Trade
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .07
-
한국과 RCEP 참여국가와의 무역구조에 관한 연구
산경연구논집
2018 .01
-
디지털 무역의 국제적 쟁점과 향후 과제
무역연구
2022 .12
-
TRIPS plus 20: From Trade Rules to Market Principles
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2016 .12
-
The Spillover Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0