지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제130호
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 275 - 310 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2023.12.130.275
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The goal of this article is to examine the nature of U.S. aid of agricultural products, which played an important role in Korean agricultural development in the 1960s. It also aims to analyze the exact meaning of ‘independence of provisions’ for Korea, which was the goal of such agricultural development, and how that issue actually progressed.
Previous studies pointed out that while the U.S. provision of agricultural products to Korea did contribute to supplement Korea’s depleted food supply after the Korean war –and especially in the wake of reconstructing the country-, it ultimately hampered the Koreans’ effort to develop their own agricultural productive capability, and made Korea more dependent on exterior aid of food provisions or imports of materials from the outside. This kind of understanding, however, was based on an observation of the 1950s, when actual foreign aid of agricultural products were even yet to commence, so it does not explain the U.S. aid of Korea in terms of agricultural products, which continued even till the year 1981. It should be noted that in the 1960s, which is also the focus of this article, U.S. was suffering from an unprecedented drop in its reserve of agricultural products, while Korea was entering an aggressive industrialization phase, and was reassessing agriculture’s role and level of priority in its governmental policies accordingly.
In this article, the U.S. situation in the 1960s, and the turnaround of its agricultural product aid policy as a result of that situation, is examined through the <Food for Peace Act>, which was enacted in 1966. Also examined here is the Korea-U.S. Treaty of Agricultural Products Aid, established based on the said Act, in order to reveal how the U.S. policy initiative regarding the Third World’s ‘independence of provisions’ merged with Park Jeong-hi regime’s aspiration for independent food security, and what kind of direction it provided to Korean agricultural administration in general.
Previous studies pointed out that while the U.S. provision of agricultural products to Korea did contribute to supplement Korea’s depleted food supply after the Korean war –and especially in the wake of reconstructing the country-, it ultimately hampered the Koreans’ effort to develop their own agricultural productive capability, and made Korea more dependent on exterior aid of food provisions or imports of materials from the outside. This kind of understanding, however, was based on an observation of the 1950s, when actual foreign aid of agricultural products were even yet to commence, so it does not explain the U.S. aid of Korea in terms of agricultural products, which continued even till the year 1981. It should be noted that in the 1960s, which is also the focus of this article, U.S. was suffering from an unprecedented drop in its reserve of agricultural products, while Korea was entering an aggressive industrialization phase, and was reassessing agriculture’s role and level of priority in its governmental policies accordingly.
In this article, the U.S. situation in the 1960s, and the turnaround of its agricultural product aid policy as a result of that situation, is examined through the <Food for Peace Act>, which was enacted in 1966. Also examined here is the Korea-U.S. Treaty of Agricultural Products Aid, established based on the said Act, in order to reveal how the U.S. policy initiative regarding the Third World’s ‘independence of provisions’ merged with Park Jeong-hi regime’s aspiration for independent food security, and what kind of direction it provided to Korean agricultural administration in general.
목차
머리말
1. 미국의 농산물 원조 위기와 농업 개발 과제의 부상
2. 한미 간 농산물 원조 협정 체결과 ‘식량 자립’의 재정향
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
금욕적 아카데미즘, 당대의 스캔들을 해부하다 : 이시윤, 『하버마스 스캔들: 화려한 실패의 지식사회학』(파이돈, 2022)
정철희
경제와사회
2024
.03
5·18 연구의 새로운 지평 : 김명희 외 7인, 『5·18 다시 쓰기: 인권의 관점에서 본 5·18 집단 트라우마와 사회적 치유』(오월의봄, 2022)·곽송연, 『오월의 정치사회학: 그날의 죽음에 대한 또 하나의 시선』(오월의봄, 2023)
정근식
경제와사회
2024
.03
실험 쥐는 관대한 존재가 될 수 있을까? : 동물실험, 다종 이야기하기, 응답과 돌봄의 과학
하대청
경제와사회
2024
.03
한국 전력공급체계의 레짐 교착과 틈새의 확장 : 사회·기술체계 전환 이론의 관점에서
최규연
경제와사회
2024
.03
신자유주의의 세 개념 : 폴라니, 마르크스, 푸코
박찬종
경제와사회
2024
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089211749