지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.2
- 수록면
- 76 - 93 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to discuss the legal limitations in processing personally identifiable health information contained in dental records. Dental records usually contain images such as panoramic rediographs, from which the patient’s anatomical information on the oral and maxillofacial region can be recognized. Recent development in data processing technology suggests the possibility of enhanced chances of human identification from this information.
To illustrate current privacy regulations related to the processing of information in dental records, relevant clauses in current laws including the Personal information Protection Act and the Medical Service Act, as well as administrative guidelines and court cases were collected and analyzed. When using dental records as evidence in trial or alternative dispute resolution, the information should be within the scope of the disputed issues and the person submitting the records must have a legitimate ground to retain the record. When processing personally identifiable information from dental records for research purposes, adequate pseudonymization is required.
Considering the possible expansion of the scope of personally identifiable information and the limitations in conducting research with highly pseudonymized Image, it is necessary to raise awareness within the dental society of the current privacy regulations, while also relaxing regulations in accordance with technological developments.
To illustrate current privacy regulations related to the processing of information in dental records, relevant clauses in current laws including the Personal information Protection Act and the Medical Service Act, as well as administrative guidelines and court cases were collected and analyzed. When using dental records as evidence in trial or alternative dispute resolution, the information should be within the scope of the disputed issues and the person submitting the records must have a legitimate ground to retain the record. When processing personally identifiable information from dental records for research purposes, adequate pseudonymization is required.
Considering the possible expansion of the scope of personally identifiable information and the limitations in conducting research with highly pseudonymized Image, it is necessary to raise awareness within the dental society of the current privacy regulations, while also relaxing regulations in accordance with technological developments.
목차
ABSTRACT
I. 서론
Ⅱ. 진료기록의 법적 성질 및 치과 진료기록의 특수성
Ⅲ. 의료분쟁에서 증거자료로 활용하는 경우
Ⅳ. 연구 목적으로 활용하는 경우
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
대학생의 사회공포수준과 치과공포수준의 관련성
박보영
,
조한아
,
방소영
외 5명
대한치과의료관리학회지
2023
.12
장애인 치과진료에 대한 치과위생사의 인식과 교육 필요성
서영주
,
양송이
,
궁화수
외 1명
대한치과의료관리학회지
2023
.12
치과진료시 위험관리와 진료기록
강병철
대한치과의사협회지
1993
.09
개인정보 보호와 소셜 미디어: 인터파크 유출 사건의 대중 반응 연구
서승우
,
고영준
,
이홍주
경영과학
2024
.03
[권오성의 노동법+] 그것이 어떻게 ‘블랙리스트’가 아니란 말인가? 취업 방해의 금지와 개인정보보호법
권오성
노동법률
2024
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0