지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: This study is purposed to investigate the effect and safety of laser therapy for stroke patients by systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: RCTs on the treatment of laser therapy for stroke patients were selected among the literature published from January 2000 to June 2022 in twelve domestic and foreign databases. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane"s Risk of Bias tool and RevMan 5.4 was used for the synthesis of results.
Results: Total 2,598 patients with stroke were finally selected from 18 RCTs. Meta-analysis showed that laser therapy was effective in significantly improving activities of daily living (MBI), motor function (effective rate), upper motor function (FMA-UE), shoulder pain related factors (CGRP, ET-1, BK). Overall, the risk of bias was uncertain or low in the quality assessment of the literature.
Conclusions: Although it is unclear that laser therapy is more effective than sham laser, laser therapy might be more effective in improving symptoms than conventional rehabilitation alone. Furthermore, no serious adverse events were founded in laser therapy studies. However, the quality of the selected literature was generally low. Therefore, further studies with high methodological quality on laser therapy for stroke patients would be required in the future.
Methods: RCTs on the treatment of laser therapy for stroke patients were selected among the literature published from January 2000 to June 2022 in twelve domestic and foreign databases. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Cochrane"s Risk of Bias tool and RevMan 5.4 was used for the synthesis of results.
Results: Total 2,598 patients with stroke were finally selected from 18 RCTs. Meta-analysis showed that laser therapy was effective in significantly improving activities of daily living (MBI), motor function (effective rate), upper motor function (FMA-UE), shoulder pain related factors (CGRP, ET-1, BK). Overall, the risk of bias was uncertain or low in the quality assessment of the literature.
Conclusions: Although it is unclear that laser therapy is more effective than sham laser, laser therapy might be more effective in improving symptoms than conventional rehabilitation alone. Furthermore, no serious adverse events were founded in laser therapy studies. However, the quality of the selected literature was generally low. Therefore, further studies with high methodological quality on laser therapy for stroke patients would be required in the future.
목차
서론
대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Ex Vivo 모델을 활용한 뇌졸중 전기 치료의 효과와 메커니즘 연구
고은민
,
고윤진
,
제갈욱
외 2명
대한기계학회 춘추학술대회
2024
.11
회복기 뇌졸중환자에서의 몰입형 상지 로봇재활치료의 효과
이정훈
,
하성규
한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
2023
.10
면역세포 냉동보관…“필요할 때 꺼내 쓴다” 난치병 환자 살리는 ‘세포은행’ 치료 : 국내외서 면역 세포 치료법 개발 경쟁
이혜진
이코노믹리뷰
2024
.11
빅데이터 기반 텍스톰 분석을 활용한 ‘뇌졸중 보행 치료’ 연구 동향 분석
돤란
,
이성노
,
시다르타비크람판데이
한국체육과학회지
2024
.10
뇌졸중에 대한 유전자 치료 연구 현황
이민형
BT NEWS
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089687645