메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김학재 (재단법인다산학술문화재단)
저널정보
성균관대학교 유교문화연구소 Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture Vol.26
발행연도
2016.8
수록면
25 - 47 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article deals with Li Zhi’s attitude toward the teachings of three religious traditions: Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism. Li was certainly a high profile figure in the Ming intellectual scene. Despite his profile, his contemporaries could not successfully recognize or categorize his ideas; he was sometimes regarded as a Buddhist monk but sometimes as a Confucian scholar-official, regardless of his claims. And he commented on such Daoist scriptures as the Laozi and the Zhuangzi. His ambiguous multiple identities, which put him into trouble, relates to the topic of sanjiao heyi (Unity of the three teachings, or Syncretism of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism). It is true that Li Zhi’s attitude toward the three teachings verged on sanjiao heyi. However, this paper argues that he should not be considered a conscious sanjiao heyi activist; rather, he should better be understood a “dao-ist fundamentalist,” due to his belief in one universal dao. In analyzing his various writings, this paper discusses that insofar as his primary concern was to realize the genuine dao, the important issue for him was not membership in a particular school or the sanjiao heyi movement but to practice dao properly. Li’s quest for dao was not out of scholastic interest but moral and practical concern.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090356295