메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jad AbiMansour (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Veeravich Jaruvongvanich (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Saran Velaga (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Ryan Law (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Andrew C. Storm (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Mark Topazian (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Michael J. Levy (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Ryan Alexander (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Eric J. Vargas (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Aliana Bofill-Garica (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) John A. Martin (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Bret T. Petersen (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Barham K. Abu Dayyeh (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA) Vinay Chandrasekhara (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA)
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy Vol.57 No.5
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
595 - 603 (9page)
DOI
10.5946/ce.2023.297

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0