메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

이재술 (조선대학교, 조선대학교 대학원)

지도교수
이민창
발행연도
2013
저작권
조선대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

2014

경로의존인가 경로진화인가? : 소득보장정책 변동과정의 사례분석
이재술 ,  이민창 한국행정논집 2014.06 학술저널

2013

소득보장정책 변동과정 분석 : 경로의존과 경로진화의 관점에서
이재술 사회복지 2013.01 학위논문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An Analysis of the Changes of Income Security Policies
- From path-dependency and path-evolution perspectives

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the claim from preceding studies that path-dependent models, which are the theories for system changes of existing historical institutionalism, have been limited in their capacity to sufficiently explain the changes in systems, by engaging in analyses of actual cases.
The path-dependent models, which are the existing theories for system changes in historical institutionalism, claim that systems and institutions go through rapid changes due to external shocks (unexpected) and then remain to be path-dependent thereafter. However, while such theories of institutional system changes might be useful in explaining drastic changes of systems, they are limited in that they cannot provide sufficient explanations for gradual and moderate changes.
Regarding the shape of changes in institutions, recent historical institutionalists have pointed out the scarcity of actual examples that can be explained by early theories on changes of institutionalism. In addition to pointing out such limitations, they eventually presented a new theory on changes of institutions for empirical analysis. Based on such recent discussion, this study attempts to link the theories on institutional changes of historical institutionalism to case analyses so that the limitations of existing theories on institutional changes can be overcome.
While it appears that both the path-dependent model and the path-evolution model recently emerged for discussion focus on explaining the changes in institutionalism, in fact their main concern is to maintain the current institution. The path-dependent models provide explanations for systems that continued on after initial disruptive changes, whereas the path-evolution model provide results-based explanations that, as an institution continued on, portions of its components would go through changes, resulting in the final form of the institution being different from initial settings. Therefore, both models attempt to provide explanations for changes of systems as well as their continuance simultaneously.
The core concepts of historical institutionalism are ''history'' and ''context''. In historical institutionalism, it is impossible to explain social phenomena or policies without proper understanding regarding the contexts. Further, it is argued that history is what forms such contexts. The macro contexts and the institutional contexts employed to analyze policy changes in the examples may provide certain influence on policy changes, thereby expediting or constraining policy changes. The following are the results of our analysis on changes of income security policies, centered around decisive events of policy changes, structural contexts, and systematic contexts:
First, we can conclude that the path-evolution model is appropriate for explaining the change patterns of income security policies. In the policies, initial temporary and singular characteristics were maintained with certain changes taking place in the components. Gradual changes continued to take place, and eventually they accumulated to turn into authoritative and comprehensive income security policies. In other words, the processes of combination and re-combination where various interactions such as layering, drifting, redirection, and layering again dynamically occurred, and over time, they have accumulated to eventually bring out a change of paths.
Second, institutional contexts constrain policy changes. The ideology of predation of colonized Chosun during the Imperialist Japan’s occupation period as well as the governing philosophy of the military regime represented by anti-communism and economic growth ultimately constrained changes in policies. The philosophy of new liberalism introduced following the globalization strategies after the civilian regime also turned into hegemonic political ideologies against regulations of capital and excluding intervention by the government after Foreign Currency Crisis experienced in 1997, imposing further constraints on changes of income security policies.
Third, critical events that affected policy changes were the “land survey project” during the Japanese occupation period, “compulsory conscription (military enlistment policy),” “5.16 military coup d''etat” for military government, and the “foreign currency crisis” after civil government. During the early period of Japanese occupation, income security policies were temporary and singular.
But Imperialist Japanese government’s “land survey project” brought about the urbanization of population by farmers who were displaced from their lands, as well as a subsequent explosive increase in the number of the poor. As a result of the land survey project, those suffering from poverty emerged from all around the country, and Chosun’s colonial government had to implement a policy to rescue the poor in 1916. Since then, the colonial government needed to mobilize labor in Chosun. In order to prevent resistance from people of Chosun, in 1944 the Mainland Imperialist Japan introduced Chosun Rescue Act combining the mother-child protection law and the medical protection law based on 1932 Rescue Act. Furthermore, as the regime of Park Jung-Hee came to power through a military coup, they lacked legitimacy in formation of their regime. Hence, in order to quickly stabilize people’s lives, the regime improved public assistant policies and implemented various social security measures. After the foreign currency crisis, further improvement in public assistant took place as the subject for 4 Social Insurances were expanded to the entire population to strengthen social security net, while demographic standards were abolished. The above discussed events provided critical motives for shifting of public policies.
Above analysis provides following suggestions: First, through analysis of actual cases, the views of the preceding studies claiming that the path-dependant models have limits in explaining institutional changes appropriately were confirmed. To this end, we engaged in theoretical considerations of two models used to explain the policy changes of historical institutionalism from the analytical viewpoint, and performed comparisons and verifications by analyzing examples. In example analysis, we analyzed macro structural contexts and the institutional context, as well as the procedures of policy changes following specific events. As a result, we could confirm that institutional changes used in our studies had the shape of path-evolution.
Second, we confirmed that income security policy changes have taken place according to multiple decision-making points and selection phases. Events such as ''land survey project'', ''compulsory conscription'', ''5.16 military coup d''etat'', and ''foreign currency crisis'' have all provided important decision-making points and selection phases for policy changes.
Third, as the policy studies of historic institutionalism are characteristically based on integrated approach over policies that combine historical review and macro structural analysis, we have determined parameters regarding the industrial structures, demographical changes, and labor movements to perform our structural analysis. In particular, we intended to improve the capacity to explain policy changes by employing various parameters that have not been used in the existing income security policy studies.

Keywords: historical institutionalism, institution, income security policy, path- evolution, path-dependant, patterns of policy changes
#historical institutionalism #institution #income security policy #path-evolution #path-dependant #patterns of policy changes

목차

【목 차】
ABSTRACT
제1장 서 론 ............................................................................................................................ 1
제1절 연구 목적 ................................................................................................................... 1
제2절 연구 범위 및 연구 방법 ........................................................................................ 5
1. 연구 범위 .................................................................................................................... 5
2. 연구 방법 .................................................................................................................... 6
제2장 이론적 배경 .............................................................................................................. 7
제1절 소득보장정책의 이론적 배경 ................................................................................ 7
1. 빈곤의 개념 ................................................................................................................ 7
2. 공공부조의 이론적 정의 ......................................................................................... 9
3. 사회보험의 이론적 정의 ....................................................................................... 10
4. 소득보장 정책의 논의 ........................................................................................... 11
제2절 신제도주의 이론과 역사적 제도주의 ............................................................... 14
1. 신제도주의 이론의 기원 ....................................................................................... 14
2. 역사적 제도주의의 등장 ....................................................................................... 17
제3절 역사적 제도주의의 제도변화 이론 .................................................................... 19
1. 제도변화 이론의 변천 ........................................................................................... 20
2. 급격한 제도변화 그리고 경로의존 ..................................................................... 22
1) 자기강화적 전개 ............................................................................................... 24
2) 반응적 경로의존 ............................................................................................... 26
3. 점진적 제도변화 그리고 경로진화 ..................................................................... 27
4. 의도적 경로이탈과 경로창조 ............................................................................... 30
5. 경로의존과 경로진화의 비교 ............................................................................... 31
제4절 선행연구 검토 ......................................................................................................... 33
1. 공공부조 정책에 관한 연구 ................................................................................. 33
2. 사회보험에 관한 연구 ........................................................................................... 35
3. 선행연구의 한계 ..................................................................................................... 37
제5절 분석을 위한 개념구성 및 분석틀 ..................................................................... 38
1. 분석을 위한 개념구성 ........................................................................................... 38
1) 구조적 맥락 ....................................................................................................... 39
2) 제도적 맥락 ....................................................................................................... 42
3) 정책변동의 결정적 전기 ................................................................................ 45
2. 분석틀 ........................................................................................................................ 47
제3장 소득보장 정책의 경로분석 ............................................................................. 48
제1절 소득보장정책의 변동과정 .................................................................................... 48
1. 일제강점기 소득보장 정책 ................................................................................... 48
1) 공공부조 ............................................................................................................. 50
2) 사회보험 ............................................................................................................. 52
2. 군사정부시기 소득보장 정책 ............................................................................... 53
1) 공공부조 ............................................................................................................. 55
2) 사회보험 ............................................................................................................. 60
3. 문민정부 이후 시기 소득보장 정책 .................................................................. 66
1) 공공부조 ............................................................................................................. 67
2) 사회보험 ............................................................................................................. 68
4. 소득보장정책 변동과정상의 특징 ...................................................................... 70
제2절 일제강점기 경로 분석 .......................................................................................... 73
1. 구조적 맥락 .............................................................................................................. 73
1) 산업구조 ............................................................................................................. 73
2) 인구학적 변화 ................................................................................................... 74
3) 노동운동 ............................................................................................................. 78
2. 제도적 맥락 .............................................................................................................. 82
1) 통치이념: 약탈적 지배 이데올로기 ........................................................... 82
2) 상위법령: 이중적 법 구조 .............................................................................. 84
3) 정치적 환경: 천왕에 예속된 조선총독 ....................................................... 86
3. 제도변화의 결정적 전기 ....................................................................................... 88
1) 토지조사사업의 실시 ....................................................................................... 88
2) 강제징병제 시행 ............................................................................................... 91
3) 정책변동 ............................................................................................................. 92
4. 소결 ............................................................................................................................ 94
1) 경로의존 모형의 대입 ..................................................................................... 95
2) 경로창조 및 진화모형 적용 ........................................................................... 96
제3절 군사정부시기 경로 분석 ...................................................................................... 97
1. 구조적 맥락 .............................................................................................................. 97
1) 산업구조 ............................................................................................................. 97
2) 인구학적 변화 ................................................................................................... 99
3) 노동운동 ........................................................................................................... 102
2. 제도적 맥락 ........................................................................................................... 106
1) 통치이념: 반공과 국가 주도의 경제발전 전략 ...................................... 106
2) 상위법령: 장기집권을 위한 수단의 헌법 ................................................ 108
3) 정치환경: 강력한 통치자의 출현 .............................................................. 111
3. 제도변화의 결정적 전기 ..................................................................................... 113
1) 5·16 군사 쿠데타 ........................................................................................... 113
2) 정책변동 ........................................................................................................... 114
4. 소결 .......................................................................................................................... 117
1) 경로의존 모형의 대입 ................................................................................... 118
2) 경로진화 모형의 대입 ................................................................................... 119
제4절 문민정부이후 경로 분석 .................................................................................... 121
1. 구조적 맥락 ............................................................................................................ 121
1) 산업구조 ........................................................................................................... 121
2) 인구학적 변화 ................................................................................................. 124
3) 노동운동 ........................................................................................................... 125
2. 제도적 맥락 ............................................................................................................ 129
1) 통치이념: 새로운 경제발전을 위한 전략으로의 신자유주의 .............. 129
2) 상위법령: 민주주의 실현을 위한 헌법 ..................................................... 135
3) 정치환경: 민주주의의 실현 ......................................................................... 137
3. 제도변화의 결정적 전기 ..................................................................................... 139
1) 새로운 발전전략으로서의 ‘세계화’와 외환위기 ...................................... 139
2) 정책변동: 소득보장 정책의 확대 ............................................................... 142
4. 소결 .......................................................................................................................... 145
1) 경로의존 모형의 대입 ................................................................................... 146
2) 경로진화 모형의 대입 ................................................................................... 147
제5절 분석결과 종합 ....................................................................................................... 148
1. 소득보장 정책의 경로진화 ................................................................................. 148
2. 정책변동을 제약하는 제도적 맥락 ................................................................... 150
3. 정책변동 촉진 요인과 정책변동 ....................................................................... 151
제4장 결론 .......................................................................................................................... 154
제1절 연구결과 요약 ....................................................................................................... 154
제2절 연구의 시사점 및 한계 ...................................................................................... 157
1. 연구의 시사점 ........................................................................................................ 157
2. 연구의 한계 ............................................................................................................ 158
참고문헌 ............................................................................................................................... 159

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0