메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

박종선 (동국대학교, 동국대학교 대학원)

지도교수
박종구
발행연도
2013
저작권
동국대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to obtain more effective visitors dispersion method and admission fee plan applicable to crowded tourist destinations through the empirical analysis of the structural relationship of attitude difference between dispersion method and coping behavior for the reduction of perceived crowding, according to the type of wellness tourists.
Regression analysis, multiple regression analysis, one-way ANOVA analysis and two-way ANOVA analysis were performed by the SPSS 18.0 statistical package for the verification of hypothesis (research model) as for the empirical analysis method. In addition, frequency analysis was performed for demographic characteristics.
As for the empirical analysis results, first, there was a difference between the types of wellness tourists in perceived crowding; interference level of wellness experience; action recognition of unhealthy behaviors of others; and willingness to pay a surcharge to reduce visit demand. The results may reflect the desire to enjoy more relaxed and leisurely sightseeing and experience as the value associated with their lives depending on the degree of importance of tourists wellness.
Second, for the importance of wellness behavior types, independent variables-social factors, psychological factors, and physical factors-were used to evaluate the effect on the properties of Slow City-slowness, natural ecology and cultural traditions. The Slow City properties, slowness and natural ecology show impacts in all the social, psychological, and physical factors, but the property of traditional culture showed significant effect only in psychological factors and physical factors.
Third, the degree of impact of social, psychological, and physical factors appeared slightly different depending on items for impact relationship of perceived crowding, degree of interference, action recognition of unhealthy behaviors of others, and willingness to pay a surcharge, according to the degree of importance of wellness.
Fourth, differences were observed in preference between visitors dispersion method (first-come, first-served basis, reservation, lottery method) and entrance fee plan (temporal, spatial differences), to meet the wellness experience. In terms of preference for the dispersion method, the most preferred method was the advance reservation through the Internet or telephone, whereas the least preferred was lottery method. In addition, for admission fee plan, as seen in previous studies, it was confirmed again that the most effective method suggested was the pricing policy among dispersion method proposed against the excessive demand.
Fifth, regarding the degree of perception by the wellness type, in the evaluation of impact on coping behavior (spatial, temporal, self-rationalization, change of destination to visit, efforts for maintenance/overcoming including ease of congestion), 2 factors of perceived crowding and the degree of interference had affects on the coping behavior for maintaining/overcoming spatial, temporal and ease congestion, while 3 factors of perceived crowding, action recognition of unhealthy behaviors of others, and willingness to pay a surcharge affected the coping behavior of self-rationalization. Perceived crowding factor and action recognition of unhealthy behaviors of others were influential to the coping behavior of change of destination to visit.
Sixth, there was differences in congestion-coping behaviors (spatial, temporal, self-rationalization, change of destination to visit, efforts for maintenance/overcoming including ease of congestion) depending on the degree (high, medium, low) of the recognition of perceived crowding.
These results are in line with the precedent studies which claimed that the visitors who witnessed excessive congestion or experienced unwanted contacts with many people had tendency to avoid congested places spatially and temporally; and they had different level of desire to go back to the state of balance through coping behaviors like site departure depending on the degree of perceived crowding, a psychological state of imbalance as they perceive too many visitors.
Academically and in terms of practical use, the results of this study have the following implications.
In the academic side, this study confirmed the structure relationship between the dispersion method, coping behavior and preferred fee plan to reduce perceived crowding according to the type of wellness tourists; thus will make an opportunity to recognize the importance again of continually expanding wellness tourism in the leisure and tourism sector; and will set off the continued interest of researchers and follow-up studies in terms of leisure and tourism reflecting the quality of life.
In the practical aspects, the results of this study will make the tourist facilities-operating principals (providers) to recognize the tourism purposes and pursuit direction of wellness tourists correctly; and to keep in their mind that more affective design of tourist congestion avoidance and preferred fee plan for the satisfaction of tourists is the key to ensure the expanding continuous inflow of visitors and success of business; and will be the starting point of more effectively management of visitors within the adequate capacity range of limited resources.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
제1절 문제제기와 연구목적 = 1
1. 문제제기 = 1
2. 연구목적 = 4
제2절 연구방법 및 연구범위 = 5
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
제1절 웰니스관광의 이론적 논의 = 8
1. 웰니스의 유사개념 = 8
1) 웰니스의 개념 = 8
2) 웰빙의 개념 = 15
3) 로하스의 개념 = 17
4) 힐링의 개념 = 19
2. 웰니스 관광의 정의와 유사개념 = 21
1) 웰니스관광의 정의 = 21
2) 의료관광의 개념 = 25
3) 힐링관광의 개념 = 26
4) 헬스관광의 개념 = 27
5) 농촌체험관광의 개념 = 28
3. 웰니스 관광명소의 구성요소 = 30
제2절 슬로시티의 이론적 논의 = 32
1. 슬로우라이프의 정의 = 32
2. 슬로시티에 관한 연구경향 = 34
3. 웰니스와 슬로시티 관광명소의 관련성 = 37
제3절 혼잡지각과 분산방법의 이론적 논의 = 42
1. 혼잡지각의 정의와 척도 = 42
2. 혼잡지각과 극복행동의 관계 = 43
3. 혼잡지각에 따른 방문객 분산방법의 필요성 = 45
제4절 입장요금제의 이론적 논의 = 49
1. 가격과 수요조정의 구조 = 49
2. 혼잡지각에 따른 입장요금 가격책정의 관계 = 53
3. 방문객 분산방법 위한 가격정책의 필요성 = 56
Ⅲ. 연구의 설계 및 방법 = 59
제1절 연구모형 및 연구가설 = 59
1. 연구 모형 = 59
2. 연구 가설 = 61
제2절 자료수집 방법 = 66
제3절 측정변수 = 68
1. 웰니스 관광객 유형 = 68
2. 슬로시티 속성 = 70
3. 혼잡지각 = 70
4. 웰니스 관광객 분산방법 = 72
5. 극복행동 = 72
제4절 설문지 구성 = 73
제5절 자료 분석방법 = 76
Ⅳ. 실증분석 = 77
제1절 조사 자료의 분석 = 77
1. 표본의 인구 통계적 특성 = 77
2. 측정도구의 신뢰도 검증 = 79
제2절 가설검증 결과 = 85
1. 웰니스 유형별 혼잡지각 관련변인의 차이 검증 = 85
2. 웰니스 추구정도와 슬로시티 속성의 중요도 검증 = 87
3. 웰니스 추구정도와 혼잡지각의 관계 검증 = 91
4. 방문자 분산방법과 입장요금제의 선호도차이 검증 = 96
5. 혼잡도 인식과 극복행동 영향관계 검증 = 101
6. 혼잡지각 인식정도와 극복행동 관련변인의 차이 검증 = 108
Ⅴ. 결론 = 110
제1절 연구결과의 요약 및 시사점 = 110
제2절 연구의 한계 및 추후 연구방향 = 113
참고문헌 = 115
설문지 = 131
ABSTRACT = 134

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0