메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김민수 (서울대학교, 서울대학교 대학원)

발행연도
2013
저작권
서울대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Dysphagia comes any time when the individual experienced difficulty moving food or liquid from mouth to stomach, or experienced choking or throat clearing during or following meal time. But the risk of dysphagia is susceptible to aging physical troubles such as change in head and neck anatomy that supports the swallowing operation, decrease in the number of teeth, weakening saliva plays, dry mouth, weakening of tongue and sphincteral muscles. Chronic disease coupled with aging and medication or other treatment process can increase the risk of dysphagia .
Dysphagia can be a fatal threat for human life as the principal cause for aspiration pneumonia, which is ranked the number one fatal disease for the elderly and also incurs malnutrition, dehydration, asphyxia and death and other serious medical problems. In addition, main symptoms for the risk of dysphagia such as slobbering, coughing, throat clearing can drag eating meal and cause anxiety with meals and avoidance of public eating. Furthermore, it may discourage social activity and inhibit psychological well-being and downgrade the dysphagia- specific quality of life. Nevertheless, in reality, the previous studies on dysphagia mainly focused on prevalence of dysphagia rather than on dysphasia risk confining its horizon to clinical approach without regards to dysphagia specific socio-psychological well-being status.
Consequently, in an effort to prevent dysphagia and its relevant complications, this research is intended to alert the risk of dysphagia of community?dwelling elderly and find dysphagia specific impact on quality life to perceive socio-psychological well-being status including functional status comprehensively.
The sampling population of this research consists of 260 Community-Dwelling Elderly aged 65 years or older who live Jong-No district in Seoul and Sung Nam City, Gyunggi province. Data collection was made during February 15- February 28, 2013. SPSS Window 18.0 was adopted to give descriptive statistics t-test and verification of x2, Logistic regression analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis to the collected data.
The average age of the 260 sample population was 75.8 inclusive of 175 women which accounts for 67.3%. 162 respondents which accounts for 62.3% subject to dysphagia risk as majority group. Neurology disease(OR=10.125, CI=1.092-93.899), gastritis(OR=5.731, CI=1.482-22.173), perceived natural teeth discomfort(OR=0.947, CI=1.311-5.196), perceived denture discomfort(OR=2.969, CI=1.016-8.677), dry mouth ‘severe’(OR=15.677, CI=2.986-82.297), ‘very severe’(OR=9.047, CI=1.680-48.726), ‘A little’(OR=4.147, CI=2.075-8.286), number of natural teeth(OR=0.947, CI=0.903-0.993) were significant factors predicting dysphagia risk in elderly. Lastly the higher dysphasia risk, the dysphagia-specific quality of life significantly lowered.
The conclusion in this study are below.
First, this study shows that the elderly are inclined to be ignorant of dysphagia lacking accurate knowledge of it. To prevent complication and downgrade the quality of life, it is essential to give proper education for the community-dwelling elderly to have right understanding of dysphagia and take countermeasure and prevention of complications
Second, effective nursing intervention programs should be developed for those elderly who are determined to have dysphagia risk on the basis of this study result. In particular, dysphagia cannot be viewed as the simple physical trouble but it must be perceived and taken into consideration, from the psycho-sociological perspectives, the functional status and dysphagia specific downgrade of quality life, and social activities should be taken into account
Third, this study has limitation to generalize the analytical conclusion to the entire national level since the elderly group sampling is taken locally only two provinces such as Seoul and Kyunggi areas. Therefore, it is encouraging to pursue ensuing study in the future to upgrade this study encompassing the elderly samples in a variety of wide community level.

목차

국문초록 ··············································································································· i
Ⅰ. 서론 ················································································································ 1
1. 연구의 필요성 ··························································································· 1
2. 연구의 목적 ······························································································· 3
3. 용어의 정의 ······························································································· 3
Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 ······································································································ 5
1. 재가노인의 연하장애 위험성 ································································ 5
2. 재가노인의 연하장애 위험요인 ····························································· 9
3. 재가노인의 연하장애와 연하 관련 삶의 질 ······································· 11
Ⅲ. 연구방법 ···································································································· 13
1. 연구설계 ·································································································· 13
2. 연구대상자 ······························································································ 13
3. 자료수집 도구 ························································································ 13
4. 자료수집 방법 ························································································ 16
5. 자료분석 방법 ························································································ 17
Ⅳ. 연구결과 ···································································································· 18
1. 복지회관 이용 노인의 특성 ·································································· 18
2. 복지회관 이용 노인의 특성에 따른 연하장애 위험성의 차이 ········ 23
3. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하장애 위험성에 영향을 미치는 요인 ···· 27
4. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하 관련 삶의 질 ·········································· 28
5. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하장애 위험성과 연하 관련 삶의 질 관계 ···· 29
Ⅴ. 논의 ············································································································· 30
1. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하장애 위험성 ············································ 30
2. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하장애 위험성에 영향을 미치는 요인 ···· 32
3. 복지회관 이용 노인의 연하장애 위험성과 연하 관련 삶의 질 ······· 35
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 ···························································································· 37
참고문헌 ············································································································ 39
부 록 ··················································································································· 43
Abstract ··········································································································· 53

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0