메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

박신전 (국민대학교, 국민대학교 대학원)

지도교수
이성우, 홍기증
발행연도
2014
저작권
국민대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수0

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Precast composite bridge decks fabricated with GFRP (glass-fiber-reinforced plastic) are a promising alternative to conventional decks made of materials such as concrete, steel, and wood for new bridges as well as for rehabilitation of existing bridges owing to their many advantages such as light weight, high strength and durability, low maintenance costs, and ease of installation. This material has been used for field applications since the 1990s in the U.S., Europe, and China.
Recently, a common guideline and the associated inspection procedure for the maintenance of in-use GFRP decks have developed by bridge owners and independent researchers. These investigations revealed severe problems such as cracking, spalling, and de-bonding of pavements or wearing surfaces of GFRP decks. Thus, there are concerns surrounding the long-term durability and serviceability of such decks. Particularly, in the case of pultruded GFRP decks, such damages are visible as reflective cracking along the bonding lines of adhesive joints between deck tubes and deck panels upon assembly of the overall deck system. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the structural causes underlying reflective cracking of pavements or wearing surfaces of a pultruded GFRP deck and investigate design improvements for structural joints and for appropriate pavement systems as countermeasures to the reflective cracking of pavements or wearing surfaces.
This study is focused on the weak-axis bending behavior of a pultruded GFRP bridge deck because this deck shows different behaviors under strong- and weak-axis bending, especially in terms of flexural stiffness and moment capacity, owing to material and shape orthotropy. I investigate overall behavior of the deck under weak-axis bending; local behaviors of the adhesive joints, which can lead to reflective cracking of asphalt pavements; and local failures of adhesive joints in a pultruded GFRP deck by closely examining deformations and stresses through tests and finite element analyses. Finally, a design study of structural joints in a pultruded GFRP deck is carried out.
In detail, I introduce the concept of reflective cracking on asphalt pavements in in-use pultruded GFRP decks, as well as the definitions of the GFRP deck’s strong and weak axes for identifying the structural causes of reflective cracking in asphalt pavements on a GFRP deck. Furthermore, I describe the effects of section geometry on weak-axis bending based on the results of a preliminary study and describe the design history of a pultruded GFRP deck called “Delta Deck TG200.”
Through three-point loading tests and FE analyses of beam-type deck specimens, the independent behavior of pultruded GFRP decks under strong- and weak-axis bending was investigated. It was found that highly localized deformation occurs at the edge of the adhesive joints in deck surfaces under weak-axis bending, and this deformation could be the cause of pavement cracking. In addition, structural safety in terms of the maximum moment and normal section forces along the deck’s strong- and weak axes, and resistance to various failure modes of the given adhesive joints under bidirectional bending at the SLS (service limit state) and the ULS (ultimate limit state) were determined. This was achieved by carrying out finite element analyses of EOP (equivalent orthotropic plate), SHL (shell element), and SLD (solid element) models. Moreover, a design study of structural joints in a pultruded GFRP deck for minimizing localized deformation at adhesive joint edges was conducted considering joint geometry and adhesive strengths.
Through this study, it was concluded that flexural stiffness and moment capacity of pultruded GFRP decks under weak-axis bending are considerably lower than the corresponding values under the strong-axis bending. This is ascribed to the local bending and shearing of individual members such as the top plate, bottom plate, and webs due to transverse shear deformation of the deck section. It was confirmed that the asphalt pavement could crack owing to highly localized deformations, as well as owing to the tensile failure (cracking) of epoxy adhesives at adhesive joint edges in deck model surfaces under design limit states.
Furthermore, this study proposed that the flexural stiffness and the moment capacity under weak-axis bending should be increased by improving section design for ensuring moment safety and increasing the deck’s load carrying capacity. In addition, it is proposed that resistance to the failure modes of the given adhesive joint should be enhanced by improving joint design and increasing adhesive strength. Furthermore, for improving joint design to minimize the localized deformation of adhesive joint, a pultruded GFRP deck with hybrid snap-fit joints considering the effects of scarf joint configuration, adhesive layer thickness, and lap joint length was proposed.

목차

Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. GFRP Decks in Bridges 1
1.2. Types of GFRP Decks in Bridges 3
1.2.1. Honeycomb sandwich decks 3
1.2.2. Solid core sandwich decks 3
1.2.3. Hollow core sandwich decks 4
1.3. Records of GFRP Decks in Bridges in Korea 5
1.4. Pavement Cracking on GFRP Decks in Bridges 5
1.4.1. Pavement cracking reported in Korea and other countries 6
1.4.2. Joint behavior under weak-axis bending 9
1.4.3. Causes of pavement cracking 10
1.5. Research Objectives and Methodology 13
1.5.1. Structural reasons of reflective cracking on pavements 14
1.5.2. Design and FE analyses under bidirectional bending 14
1.5.3. Design improvements in pultruded GFRP deck 15
1.6. Thesis Organization 15
Chapter 2. Pultruded GFRP decks in Bridges 17
2.1. Overview of Section Design 17
2.2. Section Geometry 18
2.3. Preliminary Study on Section Geometry 20
2.3.1. Deck specimens and test set-up 20
2.3.2. Tests on strong-axis bending 20
2.3.3. Tests on weak-axis bending 22
2.3.4. Effect of section geometry 23
2.4. Developed GFRP Deck 27
2.4.1. Section geometry 27
2.4.2. Material design 28
2.4.3. Adhesive at joints 35
2.5. Construction Procedures 36
2.6. Connections 37
2.6.1. Classification of FRP structure joints (EUROCOMP) 37
2.6.2. GFRP deck joints 39
2.7. Failure Modes of Adhesive Joints 41
Chapter 3. Tests on Strong- and Weak-Axes Bending 44
3.1. Overview 44
3.2. Strong-Axis Bending 44
3.2.1. Test set-up 44
3.2.2. Test results 47
3.3. Weak-Axis Bending 50
3.3.1. Test set-up 50
3.3.2. Test results 53
3.4. Flexural Stiffness and Moment Capacity 59
3.5. Cracking moment 60
Chapter 4. FE Analyses on Strong- and Weak-Axis Bending 62
4.1. Overview 62
4.2. Strong-Axis Bending 62
4.2.1. FE model 62
4.2.2. Analysis results 62
4.3. Weak-Axis Bending 65
4.3.1. FE model 65
4.3.2. Analysis results 67
4.3.3. Behaviors of adhesive joints under weak-axis bending 69
Chapter 5. Design and FE Analyses under Bidirectional Bending 76
5.1. Overview 76
5.2. Design Considerations 79
5.2.1. Service limit state (SLS) and deflection limits 81
5.2.2. Ultimate limit state (ULS) 83
5.2.3. Partial safety factors 84
5.3. Deck Models for FE Analyses 87
5.4. Analysis with EOP Model 91
5.4.1. Theory of orthotropic plate 92
5.4.2. Stiffness of EOP 93
5.4.3. Estimation on equivalent-elastic properties 103
5.4.4. Shear effect on strong- and weak-axis bending behaviors 106
5.4.5. FE model 113
5.4.6. Deflection 114
5.4.7. Strong-axis bending moment (vs. moment capacity) 119
5.4.8. Weak-axis bending moment (vs. cracking moment) 124
5.5. Analysis with SHL Model 131
5.5.1. FE model 133
5.5.2. Deflection 135
5.5.3. Section forces at top and bottom plates 139
5.5.4. Tensile failure of substrate at top and bottom flanges 150
5.5.5. Shear failure of adhesive between bonded flanges 152
5.6. Analysis with SLD Model 155
5.6.1. FE model 158
5.6.2. Deflection 163
5.6.3. Local deformation of adhesive at edge of adhesive joint 167
5.6.4. Tensile failure of adhesive at edge of bonded flanges (TAF) 177
5.6.5. Tensile failure of adhesive between vertical webs (TAW) 181
5.6.6. Shear failure of adhesive between bonded flanges (SAF) 184
5.6.7. Failure of substrate at discontinuous sections (FSD) 188
5.7. Discussions 190
5.7.1. Deflections 190
5.7.2. Moment safety 194
5.7.3. Resistance against failure modes of adhesive joint 196
Chapter 6. Design Study on Structural Joints in Pultruded GFRP Deck 200
6.1. Design Considerations 200
6.1.1. Design conditions 200
6.1.2. Effect of joint geometry 202
6.1.3. Adhesive 204
6.2. Parametric Study on Design of Adhesive Joint 205
6.2.1. Thickness of cover flange 205
6.2.2. Scarfed configuration 207
6.2.3. Thickness of adhesive layer 211
6.2.4. Elastic modulus of adhesive 212
6.3. Pultruded GFRP Bridge Deck with Hybrid Snap-Fit Joint 214
6.3.1. Section design 214
6.3.2. Connection design 216
6.3.3. Resistance to shear failure between bonded flanges 218
6.3.4. Local concentration of adhesive at edge of adhesive joint 221
6.4. Use of reinforcing plate 224
6.5. Pavements 226
Chapter 7. Conclusions 230
7.1. Weak-Axis Bending Behavior 230
7.2. Joint Behaviors of Pultruded GFRP deck 231
7.3. Design and FE Analyses under Bidirectional Bending 231
7.4. Design Study on Structural Joints in Pultruded GFRP Deck 233
References 233

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0