메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

서동우 (서울대학교, 서울대학교 대학원)

지도교수
윤제용
발행연도
2014
저작권
서울대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수0

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) process is one of membrane processes for renewable energy production. When water transports from low saline feed solution (i.e. river water) to high saline draw solution (i.e. seawater), osmotic pressure occurs to equalize salinity between two solutions. In PRO process, hydraulic pressure is applied to high saline draw solution and the water goes to hydo-turbine for clean energy production. Membrane fouling, accumulation of contaminants on membrane surface, is inevitable for all membrane processes. Membrane fouling is serious problem because it causes severe water permeation decrease and plant decay. Therefore, prevent and control membrane fouling is important in membrane processes. In spite of the importance of membrane fouling study, membrane fouling issue in PRO process has not fully investigated. Although membrane fouling issues have studied in various membrane processes, fouling mechanisms and control methods in PRO process could be different; therefore, it is required to investigate fouling behavior and its efficient control methods.
In this study, fouling effect in PRO process were investigated and several cleaning methods were applied to control the fouling. As a model membrane, commercial FO membrane (cellulose triacetate material, HTI) was used and sodium alginate was used as a model foulant. To compare fouling effect, various operating conditions were applied such as different hydraulic pressure, different draw solution concentration, different calcium ion concentration, and foulant in draw solution. As cleaning methods, two physical cleaning methods, increasing cross-flow velocity and backwash, and one chemical cleaning by using sodium hydropxide was applied. As a result, in all operating condition, severe water flux declines were shown as the effect of sodium alginate fouling in PRO process. In this study, water flux and calcium ions affected to the fouling effect, while applied hydraulic pressure and foulants in draw solution didn’t show correlations between fouling effect. For controlling sodium alginate fouling by cleaning process, all methods showed great cleaning efficiency for organic fouling in PRO process; however, effective cleaning methods by considering real PRO process should be investigated.

목차

Abstract i
Contents iii
List of Figures vi
List of Tables viii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
Chapter 2. Literature Review 5
2.1. Osmosis 5
2.2. Principle of Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) 5
2.2.1. Historical Background 5
2.2.2. Principle of PRO Process 7
2.2.3. Process Comparison of RO, FO, and PRO 8
2.3. Salt Permeation and Concentration Polarizations 11
2.3.1. Salt Permeation 11
2.3.2. Concentration Polarizations 11
2.4. Membrane Materials 16
2.4.1. Cellulose Acetate Membrane 16
2.4.2. TFC-PA Membrane 17
2.5. Spacer Effects in PRO Process 20
2.7. Membrane Fouling 22
2.7.1. Membrane Fouling in PRO Process 24
2.8. Membrane Cleaning 24
Chapter 3. Materials and Methods 25
3.1. Materials 25
3.2 Laboratory-scale PRO Process 25
3.3. PRO process performance test 28
3.4. PRO organic fouling procedure 28
3.4.1. Effect of Hydraulic Pressure 28
3.4.2. Effect of Foulant Existence in Draw Solution 29
3.4.3. Effect of Divalent Ion Concentration 29
3.4.4. Effect of Organic Fouling in PRO Process 29
3.5. TOC Analysis 29
3.6. PRO Membrane Cleaning Procedure 30
Chapter 4. Results & Discussion 31
4.1. Laboratory-scale PRO Process Performance Test 31
4.2. Effect of Hydraulic Pressure in PRO Process 34
4.3. Effect of foulants in draw solution in PRO organic fouling 37
4.4. Effect of Divalent Ion Concentration in PRO Organic Fouling 41
4.5. Effect of Organic Fouling in PRO Process 43
4.6. Membrane Cleaning for PRO Organic Fouling Control 46
4.6.1. Physical Cleaning 46
4.6.2. Chemical Cleaning 49
4.7. Comparison of Organic Fouling and Cleaning with RO and FO 52
Chapter 5. Conclusion 54
References 55
초 록 62

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0