메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

이혜인 (고려대학교, 高麗大學校 大學院)

지도교수
李翰宣
발행연도
2014
저작권
고려대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ABSTRACT

Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Piloti-Type
RC Residential Building

Lee, Hye In
School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering
Graduate School of Korea University
Advised by Prof. Lee, Han Seon

This paper was present the results of analytical simulation of shake-table response against the 1:5 scale piloti type RC residential building by using the PERFORM-3D program and according to the analytical model figure out not only the amount of displacement caused by the Rocking phenomena but also internal force distribution which were not discovered by experiment. In addition, we compared the distorted model and the true replica model to see how the gravity load affects the structure under a lateral load and compared the seismic response of an analytical model depending on the stiffness of the load cell.
When we compared the experimental result with the analytical result, we were able to learn the following. (1) The global behavior including natural period, base shear, roof drift, and overturning moment were simulated by an earthquake with a recurrence period of 50 years and the design earthquake. However, for a maximum scale earthquake, the maximum response was underestimated. (2) both the torsional moment and the torsional rotation were wholly underestimated. (3) the vertical displacement of the foundation was well simulated. (4) both the out-of-plane of slab for the elevator hall section and living room were fairly well simulated but the out-of-plane of coupled beam for the bathroom was not simulated well. (4) flexural deformation of the wall was simulated well, but shear deformation of the wall was not.
According to the analytical model analysis result (1) the base shears both in X and Y directions were mostly supported by the core part, while the 2nd story shear was considerably supported by the outer wall in both directions. (2) the axial force acting on the column was used to resist the overturning moment on the piloti story. On the 2nd story, most of the overturning moment was also resisted by the axial force acting on the exterior wall in both ends. (3) though the X direction displacement was not greatly affected by the rocking phenomena, the Y direction displacement was mostly caused by the rocking phenomena.
When we compared the distorted model and the true replica model, (1) both models were almost similar in most of the behavior including base shear, roof drift, and stiffness and strength reduction. However, the more strong earthquake, the longer the natural period of the distorted model. (2) When we compared the column P-M curves of the true replica model and the distorted model through Pushover analysis, we could not see a difference in the yield point.
According to the seismic response comparison results based on the load cell stiffness (1) the natural period was shortended both in X and Y directions. (2) the seismic response in the X direction showed a little change, while the change was significantly in the Y direction. (3) the response period of the torsional moment was reduced by more than one half while the size more than doubled.

목차

목 차
1장 서론 1
1.1 연구 배경 및 목적 1
1.2 관련된 연구 동향 3
1.3 논문의 구성 5
2장 필로티형 RC공동주택의 지진해석 6
2.1 실험체 지진모의 실험 6
2.1.1 실험체 설계 6
2.1.2 실험체 제작 12
2.1.3 실험 수행 16
2.2 해석모델의 비선형시간이력 해석 21
2.2.1 PERFORM-3D에서 벽체 모델의 개념 21
2.2.2 해석모델 수립 24
3장 실험과 해석의 상관성 32
3.1 전체거동 비교 32
3.1.1 고유주기 32
3.1.2 밑면전단력 및 지붕층 변위 33
3.1.3 Y방향 밑면전단력 분포 및 필로티층 횡변위 비교 37
3.1.4 비틀림 모멘트 및 비틀림 변위 비교 43
3.1.5 전도모멘트 비교 47
3.2 국부변형비교 50
3.2.1 기초변위 비교 50
3.2.2 슬래브 면외휨 분포 비교 52
3.2.3 벽체변형 비교 54
3.3 해석결과의 신뢰성과 한계성 56
4장 해석 결과 분석 58
4.1 시간이력 해석 결과분석 58
4.1.1 밑면전단력분포와 층전단력분포 비교 58
4.1.2 전도모멘트 저항메커니즘 비교 62
4.1.3 메커니즘 분석 66
4.2 비선형 정적 해석결과 비교 67
4.3 기초들뜸에 의한 변위 71
4.4 결론 74
5장 축소모형 진모델의 해석결과 분석 75
5.1 진모델과 왜곡모델의 비선형 해석결과 비교 75
5.1.1 진모델의 중력하중과 지진하중 적용 75
5.1.2 고유주기 76
5.1.3 시간이력 해석결과 비교 77
5.1.4 비선형 정적해석 결과 비교 81
5.2 로드셀 강성에 따른 해석결과 85
5.2.1 고유주기 비교 85
5.2.2 시간이력 해석결과 비교 86
5.3 결론 92
6장 요약 및 결론 95
6.1 요약 95
6.2 결론 95
6.3 연구성과 98
참고문헌 100

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0