메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

고현우 (부경대학교, 부경대학교 대학원)

지도교수
오준일
발행연도
2015
저작권
부경대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수3

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (3)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examined Korean secondary school English teachers’ perceptions of expertise in speaking performance assessment, their perceptions of how useful speaking performance assessment is, and their perceptions of what makes it difficult to implement speaking performance assessment in the classroom. It also identified the effects of such perceptions on their speaking performance assessment practice. The present study surveyed 243 secondary English teachers (128 in middle and 115 in high school) from 5 different districts. The data analysis about an open-ended question for qualitative research was included as well. To explore the four research questions, the results were compared and analyzed by T-test, ANOVA, Correlation Analysis, and SEM (Structural Equation Model).
The findings of the study were as follows. First, the perceptional differences in expertise, usefulness and infeasibility of speaking performance assessment between middle and high school English teachers were compared. High school English teachers had lower expertise in speaking performance assessment, while both of them generally had positive perception in its pedagogical effectiveness. High school English teachers also felt much more trouble in conducting speaking performance assessment than their counterparts did, owing to several reasons such as the difficulty of guaranteeing objectivity in scoring, no proper methods or tools for assessment, the shortage of helpful materials or teacher training programs, or the possibility of giving students another learning burden.
Secondly, English teachers’ perceptional differences in expertise, usefulness and infeasibility of speaking performance assessment were investigated, according to teaching career, teacher training related to speaking performance assessment, and perceived competence in English speaking. English teachers with 11-15 years of teaching career were more professional in implementation and scoring of speaking performance assessment, rather than those with 16-20 years of teaching career. To enhance English teachers’ professional competence and raise their positive awareness of the effectiveness of speaking performance assessment, at least more than once or twice completing the teacher training related to speaking performance assessment proved helpful. Besides, English teachers who thought their perceived competence in English speaking was superior showed the excellent competence and affirmative awareness of speaking performance assessment.
Thirdly, English teachers’ perceptions in expertise, usefulness and infeasibility of speaking performance assessment were correlated to one another. It indicated that English teachers with overall more positive awareness of the educational effectiveness of speaking performance assessment had much more expertise in speaking performance assessment, or vice versa. Meanwhile, English teachers with higher awareness of the infeasibility of speaking performance assessment held lower expertise in speaking performance assessment, or vice versa. The higher infeasibility English teachers perceived in speaking performance assessment, in addition, the lower they considered the usefulness of speaking performance assessment in English education, or vice versa.
Last but not least, this study revealed the causal effect of English teachers’ perceptions in expertise, usefulness and infeasibility of speaking performance assessment on their speaking performance assessment practice. Obviously, English teachers highly equipped with expertise in speaking performance assessment were strongly willing to carry out speaking performance assessment in the classroom. Although English teachers positively perceived its educational effectiveness, however, English teachers tended to implement speaking performance assessment, only if they were much ready with professional competence in speaking performance assessment. Overcoming the infeasibility in speaking performance assessment, English teachers tended to be minimally trying to execute speaking performance assessment, just in case English teachers not only highly recognized the educational merits of speaking performance assessment, but they also had splendid competence in speaking performance assessment.
The implications of the research findings were discussed. And pedagogical suggestions to activate speaking performance assessment practice in Korean educational settings were provided.

목차

목 차
영문초록 viii
Ⅰ. 서론 1
1.1 연구의 필요성 1
1.2 연구의 목적 5
1.3 연구 과제 6
1.4 연구의 구성 7
1.5 연구의 제한점 8
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 9
2.1 영어과 수행평가 9
2.2 말하기 수행평가의 효용성 12
2.2.1 성취도 측면 13
2.2.2 정의적 측면 14
2.2.3 수업 개선의 측면 16
2.3 말하기 수행평가의 전문성 18
2.4 말하기 수행평가의 시행한계성 23
2.5 교사의 평가 시행에 영향을 미치는 요인 28
Ⅲ. 예비 연구 33
3.1 예비 연구의 과제 33
3.2 예비 연구의 방법 34
3.3 예비 연구의 분석 결과 및 논의 38
3.4 예비 연구의 보완점 41
Ⅳ. 연구 방법 43
4.1 연구 대상 43
4.2 연구 도구 46
4.2.1 설문지 46
4.2.2 신뢰도 및 타당도 48
4.3 자료의 수집 절차 및 분석 방법 52
Ⅴ. 연구 결과 및 논의 55
5.1 학교급간 말하기 수행평가의 전문성, 효용성 및 시행한계성에 대한 인식 55
5.1.1 학교급간 말하기 수행평가의 전문성에 대한 인식 차이 56
5.1.2 학교급간 말하기 수행평가의 효용성에 대한 인식 차이 70
5.1.3 학교급간 말하기 수행평가의 시행한계성에 대한 인식 차이 76
5.1.4 학교급간 말하기 수행평가의 시행한계성에 대한 개선 방안 91
5.1.5 요약 98
5.2 배경 변인에 따른 말하기 수행평가의 전문성, 효용성 및 시행한계성에 대한 인식 101
5.2.1 배경 변인에 따른 말하기 수행평가의 전문성에 대한 인식 차이 101
5.2.2 배경 변인에 따른 말하기 수행평가의 효용성에 대한 인식 차이 112
5.2.3 배경 변인에 따른 말하기 수행평가의 시행한계성에 대한 인식 차이 115
5.2.4 요약 116
5.3 말하기 수행평가의 전문성, 효용성 및 시행한계성 간의 상관관계 119
5.3.1 전체 영어교사들을 대상으로 한 세 주요 요인들 간의 상관관계 분석 120
5.3.2 중학교 영어교사들을 대상으로 한 세 주요 요인들 간의 상관관계 분석 123
5.3.3 고등학교 영어교사들을 대상으로 한 세 주요 요인들 간의 상관관계 분석 124
5.3.4 요약 126
5.4 말하기 수행평가의 시행에 대한 구조방정식모형 127
5.4.1 이론적 모형 128
5.4.2 구조방정식모형의 정규성 검정 130
5.4.3 구조방정식모형의 적합도 검증 132
5.4.4 구조방정식모형의 해석 133
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 140
6.1 연구의 결론 140
6.2 제언 142
참고문헌 146
부록 158

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0