지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- 저자정보
- 지도교수
- 정창모
- 발행연도
- 2016
- 저작권
- 부산대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
이용수3
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this study was to evaluated the clinical findings and patient satisfaction on implant overdenture designed with Locator implant attachment or Locator bar attachment in mandibular edentulous patients. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, probing depth, peri-implant inflammation, bleeding, plaque, calculus, complications and satisfaction were evaluated on 16 patients who were treated with mandibular overdenture and were used for at least 1 year. (Locator implant attachment: n = 8, Locator bar attachment: n = 8)
Marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index of Locator bar attachment group were significantly lower than Locator implant attachment group (p<0.05). There were no significant difference on bleeding, peri-implant inflammation, patient satisfaction between the two denture types (p>0.05) Replacement of attchment components was the most common complication in both groups. Although there were no correlation between marginal bone loss and plaque index, significant correlation was found between marginal bone loss and probing depth.
Locator bar attachment group indicates lesser marginal bone loss and need for maintenance compared with Locator implant attachment group. This may be due to the splinting effect among implants rather than the types of Locator attachment.
Marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index of Locator bar attachment group were significantly lower than Locator implant attachment group (p<0.05). There were no significant difference on bleeding, peri-implant inflammation, patient satisfaction between the two denture types (p>0.05) Replacement of attchment components was the most common complication in both groups. Although there were no correlation between marginal bone loss and plaque index, significant correlation was found between marginal bone loss and probing depth.
Locator bar attachment group indicates lesser marginal bone loss and need for maintenance compared with Locator implant attachment group. This may be due to the splinting effect among implants rather than the types of Locator attachment.
목차
1. 서론 12. 연구 재료 및 방법 42.1 연구 대상 42.2 피개의치 42.3 임상검사 62.3.1 임플란트 생존율 62.3.2 임플란트 변연골 흡수 62.3.3 탐침 깊이 72.3.4 임플란트 주위염 72.3.5 출혈 지수 72.3.6 치태 지수 82.3.7 치석 82.3.8 합병증 82.4 환자 만족도 조사 92.5 통계학적 분석 93. 연구 결과 113.1 임플란트 생존율 113.2 임플란트 변연골 흡수와 탐침 깊이 133.3 임플란트 주위염과 출혈 지수 133.4 치태지수와 치석 143.5 임플란트 변연골 흡수, 치태지수, 탐침깊이 상관관계 153.6 합병증 153.7 환자 만족도 164. 총괄 및 고찰 175. 결론 206. 참고문헌 217. 영문요약 25
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0