메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

권무성 (경희대학교, 경희대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김종호
발행연도
2016
저작권
경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수1

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
South Korea, the United States, along with the UK, the introduction of the 1980s new public management theory, research and interest for the results and evaluation began to rise. And For the purpose of improving the
operational efficiency and effectiveness of the public sector in 1997 of the IMF of overcoming process, such as a variety of management techniques began to be introduced in earnest.
According to the local public enterprises law, local public companies, unlike the private sector, are explicitly must pursue a public nature. For these reasons, we receive a management evaluation every year from local government. Evaluation since it was enacted, it was through the several times of transition process. But in reality, there is no fundamental improvement that the critical point of the system.
Largely, Local public Enterprises is divided into local direct management companies, local public Enterprise, local Enterprise the third sector. Among them, in the present study, I studied the Facility Management enterprises.
Go through the study, I try to examine the critical point of the system and analyze the impact factors and degree of utilization.
How to evaluate the impact factor of objectivity, reasonableness of the procedure, and set the evaluator''s credibility. In the study model, given factors influenced by a positive impact on the utilization of the results of
utilizing the results reflect the degree goes up further in the Task Force.
To conduct research domestic of thesis, Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs data, the agency site, collected data through reports.
Once The survey was conducted. Regression analysis objectivity of the way during the objectivity topic of evaluation methods, how to see whether or not the crazy a significant effect on the dependent variable in the rationality item of evaluation procedures procedural ready adequacy, appropriateness of the audit, procedures of understanding the impact of significant influence to
be analyzed. Other factor analysis, correlation analysis was performed.
Therefore, in there Facilities Management Corporation procedural participation, the minimization of procedure, the agency considers whether the particularities, the adequacy of the indicators were analyzed that there is
a problem. So Improvement for each problem is considered to be in desperate need.
Presenting improvement to enhance the effectiveness, First, the procedure is whether participation phase. In other words, that it would need to make to have an organic relationship between the evaluation target organs. Reviewed by understanding and expertise in the evaluation process because he can activate the communication between the evaluator and appraiser blood.
Second, the minimum side of the process. In this more specifically it means that the process can be more efficiently conducted in the further evaluation
of the effectiveness. It looks that include a periodic assessment and evaluation schedule in content. In order to assess the improvements achieved and the problems found in the institutions that are intended to reduce the
time gap between the evaluation and its utilization for. Such a request is raised to improve every year, but the situation that does not substantially change.
Third, whether the specificity of institutions considered. First of all, the business environment will reflect the difference between the Corporation and
the Corporation. And discard the ranking evaluation method according to the evaluation results. Qualitative indicators should also be improved. As a result, it should be the right choice to macroscopic evaluation conducted customized management systems when viewing.
Fourth, the appropriateness of the surface. Current indicators to enforce respect for the underprivileged, facilities and environmental protection, workers'' welfare, such as the evaluation more publicity than the metrics of profitability-related indicators in local public center that does not meet its original objectives and deliver results. Therefore, adopting a dual approach as the French public assessment system.
If the measures, until now presented to improve this looks to be a high enhancement can be expected. Furthermore, the Metropolitan Facilities Management Corporation Saints operational effectiveness will be offered.

목차

제1장 서론 1
제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
제2절 연구 범위와 방법 4
제2장 이론적 논의 7
제1절 지방공기업의 의의 7
1. 지방공기업의 개념 7
2. 지방공기업의 유형 9
3. 지방공기업의 필요성 12
제 2절 경영평가제도와 결과활용 14
1. 경영평가제도 개념과 법적기초 14
2. 경영평가제도 절차와 제도적 한계 18
3. 평가결과활용의 개념 22
4. 평가결과활용의 인식과 효과성 23
제 3절 선행연구 검토 및 차별성 26
1. 지방공기업 경영평가제도 활용 관련 연구 26
2. 시설관리공단의 이론적 개요 관련 연구 30
3. 시사점 및 연구의 차별성 32
제 3장 연구방법 34
제 1절 연구모형 및 가설 34
1. 연구모형 34
2. 연구가설 34
제 2절 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정도구 37
1. 조작적 정의 37
2. 측정도구 38
제 3절 자료수집 및 분석방법 40
1. 자료수집 40
2. 분석방법 40
제 4장 연구결과 42
제 1절 조사대상의 일반적 특성 42
제 2절 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석 48
1. 요인분석 48
2. 신뢰도분석 50
3. 상관관계분석 50
제 3절 연구의 가설검증 51
1. 가설 1의 검정 51
2. 가설 2의 검정 56
3. 시사점 58
제 5장 결론 60
제 1절 연구요약 60
제 2절 정책적 제언 61
제 3절 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향 65
참고문헌 67
부 록 - 설문지 73
ABSTRACT 77

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0