메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

여미 (경성대학교, 경성대학교 대학원)

지도교수
이창노
발행연도
2016
저작권
경성대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수20

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is a tactile EEG experimental study to sense the surface of interior finishing materials by rubbing it with palm or fingers. It includes experienced recognition as it incorporates participants'' subjective assessment of touch of feel.
This study approaches people''s comfortableness with interior finishing materials through relaxation or arousal. Therefore, the purpose of this study lies in measuring changes in central nervous system, i.e. changes in brainwave, identifying which finishing materials are comfortable, in other words, relaxible if touched, adding meaning to physical functions of the materials to be applied into interior space when manufacturing them, and providing effective indoor environment.
Subjects for experiment are those who want to participate in this experiment. Participants pass through one-man preliminary experiment. A total of 46 male and female adults aged 20 to 43 years participated. In nature of brainwave, subjects from various fields of major and occupation constituted the participant group.
The electrode sites for measuring brainwave are FP1, FP2, F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4, O1, O2, F7, F8, T3, T4, T5, T6, CZ, FZ, and PZ, and to these, AFZ is added.
Eight (8) tactile stimulations of indoor finishing materials, in other words, metallic material, plastic film, lumber, stone, glass, silk wallpaper, fabric, and paint were touched and felt. ‘α-wave against β-wave’ appearing as a result of a mental process related to physiological response in human''s brain was studied intensively and subsequently, changes in ‘relative θ-wave’, ‘relative α-wave’, ‘relative β-wave’, and ‘relative γ-wave’ were analyzed and observed.
For experimental analysis, TeleScan 3.10 was used to collect and analyze data and SPSS statistical program (ver. 22) was used to calculate mean and standard deviation from all data measured. Also for verifying if each finishing material is statistically significant, one-way ANOVA was conducted for data processing.

As a result, αp/βp , R.θp , R.αp , R.βp , and R.γp appeared statistically significant as brainwave appearing in the part of brain of each channel for eight (8) finishing materials and the following conclusions could be obtained from the findings obtained.

First, in tactile stimulation of interior finishing materials, stable waveform was more prevalent in smooth finishing materials than in rough ones and arousal waveform was more prevalent in smooth finishing materials than in rough ones. But, the finishing materials that might cause tension like stone although the smoothness of the surface of the finishing materials was well-treated were excluded. Such warm finishing materials as fabric although they show EEG characteristics close to arousal because they have much unevenness on the surface of finishing materials are considered to have rather brought about convenient relaxation. Plastic film appeared as the most relaxed finishing material in EEG characteristics caused by tactile stimulation and silk wallpaper as the most aroused one in the same. Silk wallpaper is a finishing material evaluated as the roughest one in terms of feeling of the surface by most subjects.

Second, in tactile stimulation on the surface texture of interior finishing materials, rough surface is uncomfortable and aroused because senses felt from hand cause sense of pain (sense that recognizes pain). Brainwave response depends significantly on roughness and smoothness of surface and also depends on warmness and coldness of temperature. Brainwave response sometimes appeared mixed in the smoothness and roughness on the surface of finishing materials and in the smoothness and warmness on the same, and other times appeared mixed in the warmness and roughness on the surface of finishing materials and in the coldness and smoothness on the same. But, these appeared more clearly when the difference in texture or unevenness on the surface of finishing materials was obvious.

Third, in the characteristics of tactile brainwave on the surface texture of finishing materials, it was analyzed that it is not that all that are smooth and soft are comfortable and all that are rough and hard are uncomfortable, and it was analyzed that appropriate combination of temperature and surface texture should be achieved to give comfortableness to people. Here, temperature can be considered as the degree of psychological stability when people touch the surface of finishing materials. But, the degree of such ‘stability’ depends on person, which thus leads to limitations.

Fourth, taken together within the scope of this study, tactile sensing of tactile stimulation on the surface of interior finishing materials showed contrasting response in the difference between smoothness and roughness of surface and in the difference between warmness and coldness of surface, caused relaxation wave and arousal wave in the brainwave, and showed difference in the response. But, this study has rather limitations because senses from surface texture depend on individual difference or person.

Fifth, this study approaches comfortableness through relaxation and arousal. α-wave increases and β-wave decreases, thus leading to relaxation and α-wave decreases and β-wave increases, thus bringing about arousal. This suggests that even when α-wave only increases and β-wave remains, it brings about relaxation and even when β-wave only decreases and α-wave remains, it brings about relaxation. Therefore, it was judged that it would be good to see two parameters of α-wave and β-wave, in other words, relaxation and arousal as comfortableness indicators for the interior finishing materials in terms of proportion.

Sixth, psychological shapes of experience recognition on the surface texture of interior finishing materials were not evenly reflected in brainwave. It was analyzed that physical properties of surface texture seem to have a stronger influence on the characteristics of tactile brainwave on the surface texture of finishing materials than experience recognition. In other words, the texture properties of an object currently contacted are reflected in brainwave rather than previous experience related psychology because the surface of finishing materials is directly contacted.

In conclusion, emotion caused by tactile stimulation can become a cause that may form psychological stability or generate anxiety. Stimulus related to various tactile senses that may cause feelings in humans is associated with various types of stimulus such as environmental changes and physical contact. This will stimulate human brain and produce another psychological form of experienced recognition. Therefore, if more efficient indoor environment is provided based on such mental process studies in order to apply finishing materials into space, it will have a positive impact on the formation of human feelings. Also, if such characteristics of brainwave can be reflected in a variety of finishing materials, ‘space user''s convenience’ will be enhanced more.
To this end, the purpose of putting the results of this study into practical use is to make an approach in various directions for applying various finishing materials used in interior space, for applying into where requires relaxation or arousal if contacted, for manufacturing and using living furniture, for manufacturing and using furnitures and fixtures, and for manufacturing and using other various goods and to achieve effective utilization that may satisfy functionality in a fundamental way by incorporating transcendental human nature into space.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 17
1. 연구의 배경과 목적 17
1.1. 연구의 배경 17
1.2. 연구의 목적 18
2. 연구의 방법과 범위 20
2.1. 연구의 방법 20
2.2. 연구의 범위 21
3. 연구의 진행 과정 23
4. 용어의 정의 24
Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 28
1. 뇌파의 정의와 특성 28
1.1. 뇌파의 정의와 배경 28
1.2. 뇌파의 파형에 따른 주요 특성 28
1.3. 뇌의 각 부위와 기능 30
1.4. 뇌파의 이완반응과 각성반응 31
2. 실내공간에 대한 인간지각 33
2.1. 실내공간에 대한 감각과 지각경험 33
2.2. 실내마감재에 대한 지각경험 35
2.3. 실내공간에서의 촉각지각 37
3. 물체 표면에 대한 촉지각 39
3.1. 촉각과 뇌 39
3.2. 물체에 대한 피부감각 41
3.3. 물체 표면질감의 결 탐지 44
3.4. 물체 표면질감의 측정법 47
Ⅲ. 뇌파 실험 방법과 진행 49
1. 실험방법 및 분석 틀 설정 49
1.1. 기존 실험방법의 고찰 49
1.2. 본 실험방법의 설정 52
1.3. 분석의 틀 53
2. 실험 환경 57
2.1. 실험실과 실험도구 57
2.2. 실험자극물 마감재 선정 59
2.3. 피험자 선정 및 유형 62
2.4. 실험진행 및 제시사항 64
3. 마감재 표면에 대한 주관적 평가 70
3.1. 주관적 촉감평가 71
3.2. 주관적 감정평가 72
Ⅳ. 뇌파 실험 분석 75
1. 마감재별 뇌파분석 방법 75
2. 연구의 중점적 분석(알파파/베타파) 76
2.1. 마감재별 베타파에 대한 알파파 76
2.2. 마감재별 알파파/베타파의 뇌파 측정 및 반응 분석 76
2.3. 마감재별 알파파/베타파의 뇌파특성 85
3. 주파수 대역에 대한 상대파워의 변화 94
3.1. 마감재별 상대세타파 변화 94
3.2. 마감재별 상대알파파 변화 112
3.3. 마감재별 상대베타파 변화 131
3.4. 마감재별 상대감마파 변화 149
Ⅴ. 종합분석 167
1. 연구결과의 검증과 조합정리 167
1.1. 연구의 검증 167
1.2. 연구결과의 조합정리 177
2. 연구논의 및 한계점 186
3. 연구결과의 적용방안 188
Ⅵ. 결론 190
참고문헌 194
ABSTRACT 198
부 록 203

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0