메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

하영선 (고려대학교, 고려대학교 대학원)

지도교수
朱英奎
발행연도
2017
저작권
고려대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
PEB(Pre-Engineered Building) system is a steel portal frame with tapered built up members. The members are tapered to optimize material usage based on the shape of bending moment diagram. It is ideal for low rise long span buildings such as warehouse and factory due to its flexibility for expansion, fast construction, allows large open space and cheaper construction. However, precise design criteria and guidelines are needed because it is composed of non-compact section which can easily buckle under sudden loads.
The PEB system seismic design standards and guidelines are clearly presented in US and Europe. In general, PEB system are classified as steel ordinary moment frames(OMF) and using the response modification factor of 3.5. In Korea, however, it is categorized as general steel structures that are not detailed seismic and uses the R factor of 3.0. It can be seen as conservative that load does not fully reflect the structural performances of PEB system.
To reinforce of PEB connection performance, investigation of state-of-the-art of steel beam-column seismic reinforcement was conducted. As a results, there was three kinds of concept for reinforcing seismic performance of steel beam-column connection. The first is “strengthening section”, the second is “weakening section”, and the last one is “damper”.
Strengthening section types are divided into plate reinforcement, rib reinforcement, panel zone reinforcement, and stiffener reinforcement. It can be increase the performance of connection by reinforcing additional section. Weakening section types are divided into RBS(Reduced Beam Section) and RWS(Reduced Web Section). It is a concept to cut the beam section to serve as a structural damper. Damper types have friction damper and slit damper. Damper is additional device to enhance the seismic performance of the structure.
In this paper, “strengthening section” and “damper” concept are used to enhance the seismic performance of PEB connection to considering safety of the system because PEB system has optimized section already.
Finite element analysis is performed before the experiment to develop the seismic joint reinforcement details of PEB structure system, called π-joint(PI joint) and Brace type joint. π-joint has two types of joint details. One is tapered plate on the inner flange of rafter and column connection and the other is C-plate on the panel zone combined with tapered plate type. Brace type joint has three types of joint details. One is Linear shape brace, another is Uniformly curved shape brace and the other is Variously curved shape brace.
The purpose of this thesis is to develop the seismic reinforcement details for PEB structure system and evaluate the seismic performance of PEB frames under cyclic load. The final goal of this research is to propose PEB system as steel ordinary moment frame system by evaluating response modification factor(R factor).
In this paper, the cyclic loading test is performed with sixteen 3/8 scaled down PEB sub-assemblage frame specimens. The seismic performance of the specimens is evaluated by energy dissipation capacity, strength and response modification factor(R factor). As a result, it could be figured out that PEB system can be categorized as steel ordinary moment frame and π-joint and Brace type joint can enhance the seismic capacity of PEB structure to steel intermediate moment frame.

목차

1. 서 론 1
1.1 연구 배경 1
1.2 연구 내용 및 범위 2
2. 기술동향분석 4
2.1 접합부 내진보강 4
2.1.1 단면보강형 5
2.1.2 단면감소형 7
2.1.3 댐퍼조합형 8
2.2 접합부 실험 Set-up 10
2.3 반응수정계수 13
2.4 소결 16
3. 접합부 변수 해석 17
3.1 개요 17
3.1.1 PEB 평가 17
3.1.2 유한요소해석 18
3.2 접합부 내부 보강 상세 21
3.2.1 변수설정 21
3.2.2 해석결과 22
3.3 접합부 외부 보강 상세 25
3.3.1 변수설정 25
3.3.2 해석결과 27
3.4 소결 29
4. PEB 내진성능평가실험 31
4.1 접합부 개요 31
4.1.1 π-joint 31
4.1.2 Brace Type 32
4.2 실험 개요 33
4.2.1 실험체 상세계획 33
4.2.2 실험 세팅 38
4.2.3 가력계획 43
4.2.4 계측계획 44
4.2.5 재료실험 46
4.3 π-joint 구조성능평가 48
4.3.1 이력특성 및 파괴형상 48
4.3.2 변형률 분포 60
4.3.3 에너지 소산능력 63
4.4 Brace Type 구조성능평가 65
4.4.1 이력특성 및 파괴형상 65
4.4.2 변형률 분포 71
4.4.3 에너지 소산능력 74
4.5 소결 75
5. 내진성능평가 76
5.1 반응수정계수 76
5.2 유한요소해석 80
5.2.1 해석개요 81
5.2.2 해석결과 83
5.3 소결 92
6. 결론 93
참고문헌 95

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0