메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

임연홍 (전북대학교, 全北大學校)

지도교수
朴律鎭
발행연도
2017
저작권
전북대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Plants are the basis for sustainable green growth, and the value of existence and importance of trees including landscape trees can’t be emphasized enough. Therefore, they are precious living things thriving in all sorts of public services, and continuous civil complaints for justifiable compensation of landscape trees are filed.
Therefore, the study figures out appraisal methods necessary for compensation for loss appraisal process and lawsuit appraisal of landscape trees, and surveys a group of experts on methods of compensation for loss of landscape trees. Also, the study proposes a standardized formula for normal planting intervals based on target specifications of produced landscape trees.
Based on these, a new classification system of appraisal method due to reclassification of landscape trees added to public services shall be established, and has its purpose in gaining a foothold of realistic compensation system due to environmental changes of the times by proposing appraisal standards, and the results are shown below.

First, by analyzing terminology usage present in the current landscape tree appraisal, the term landscape tree is more widely used in the market than ornamental trees which is used in the law, and revision is necessary.
According to 「Public Service Legislation」, the classification standard of trees (produced landscape trees) intended for sales is ambiguous, the classification standard for medium sized trees and seedlings is abstract, reasonable evaluation methods of landscape trees does not exist, and standards of planting trees do not really exist. Also, reestablishment of significant terminology concept is necessary since the concept for the price of withering plants is uncertain, price concept of proper material has not been proposed, and criteria for withering rate is imperfect.
As a result, compensation varies depending on the interpretation of landscape tree appraisers, and a universal and reasonable terminology establishment is urgent, and it is thought to be appropriate to classify seedlings by seedling raising stage, growth period, and product stage.

Second, results of analyzing legislation cases related to landscape trees: growing trees of forest land are materials, and apply age of final cutting when reaching harvest, and apply cost of sales loss when they have not reached harvest. Fruit trees are profitable plants with the purpose of producing fruits, and shall be considered as landscape trees if they do not meet economic production goals. When the landscape trees are adult trees, and if they are in a higher density than standard planting intervals, cost of sales loss shall be applied considering time required for commercialization.

Third, results of Delphi analysis related to appraisal improvement plan: tree producers are shown to apply and classify appraisal methods using subdivided produced landscape trees (produced landscape trees available for commercialization, landscape trees which have not approached the stage of commercialization, landscape trees in sowing or germination). On the other hand, shrub producers prefer evaluation by planting intervals according to target standard sizes, and appraisers claim that distinct appraisal regulations are necessary as different species have different planting purposes.

Fourth, the standard formula of planting intervals according to production target specifications is calculated using root-collar caliper and diameter at breast height, and apply ① standard medium sized trees which have not yet reached commercialization [deciduous tree production goal (R(B) less than 6cm]= (target standard)= [target standard R(㎝)× 15 × 0.7]. ② In case of commercialization (R6~R10)= [target standard R(㎝) × 15 ± 5%], ③ In case of more than R12= [target standard R(㎝) × 15 × 130%] shall be applied. In case of using diameter at breast height ④ In case of commercialization(B6~B10)= [target standard B(㎝) × 20 × 15±5%], ⑤ In case of more than B12= [target standard B(㎝) × 20 × 130%] shall be applied.
The formula deduced in order to calculate estimated planting intervals for production goal standards is expect to easily and conveniently apply to the work by target standards when appraisals take place considering planting environment and plant types which is similar to the result of the actual approval standard.

Fifth, appraisal methods based on tree classification of compensation for loss are classified according to planted locations. ① landscape trees within a house=[price of arrival at the site + planting cost], ② landscape trees in places such as arboretum=[ management technology of tress + relocation expenses considering scarcity of the trees ③ landscape trees in a place of loads= [landscape tree production cost + work out added price. In case of producted landscape threes ④ landscape trees ready to be commercialized as sales loss, ⑤ and landscape trees not ready to be commercialized shall be calculated by reducing current price of the future investment cost and invested price till commercialization from expected gross income of the target standard. ⑥Landscape trees in sowing and germination stage will be calculated using the current price of the cost used until the point of time for price.

Sixth, prearranged plans and preparations must be done thoroughly in order for the act of making a living to continue in the relocated place and minimize the loss of acceptance by having justifiable production to occur with justifiable compensation for the subjects of acceptance among all considerations of landscape tree appraisals.

The appraiser shall precisely figure out opinions of the subjects of acceptance for justifiable acts of farming and continuous acts of making a living as to make a fair evaluations. Also, the appraiser’s own regulations shall be abided by, but there is a responsibility to deduce a fair and impartial evaluation among acceptor and subjects of acceptance.
Acceptor including the nation, local government, and government-invested institutions shall revise the law to be more detailed and subdivided which accords with the acceptance for the compensation of landscape trees of 「Public Service Legislation」. Especially when accepting land for public purposes, prearranged plan shall be made to make justifiable compensations, and detailed and subdivided approach focusing on the field is requested from the budget establishment process.

As mentioned above, future public service’s efficient progress and justifiable compensations of production farms are hoped to be made based on the study results related to improvements of appraisal methods of landscape tree’s compensation for loss. However, producer’s cultivation methods and environments have not been considered since research subjects were limited to partial production farms and appraisers. Also, a lot of controversy is expected regarding the point of view of the appraisers depending on expert experience and knowledge. Continuous further studies are necessary since research period was temporary, and discussions of landscape trees’ quality and opinions of related organizations and research institution have not been collected.

목차

제1장 서 론 1
제1절 연구의 배경 1
제2절 연구의 목적 2
제2장 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 5
제1절 조경수 가격 기본이론 및 식재밀도 5
1. 조경수의 가격 형성인자 5
2. 유통시장에서의 조경수 가격 10
3. 조경수의 식재밀도 13
제2절 조경수 손실보상의 이해 및 감정평가 관련 법률 16
1. 손실보상의 개념 16
2. 손실보상의 절차 18
3. 조경수 감정평가 관련 법률과 방법 21
4. 조경수 관련 최근 법원 판례 동향 29
제3절 조경수 감정평가 제도의 외국사례 32
1. 일본 32
2. 미국 35
3. 영국 36
4. 뉴질랜드 36
5. 스페인 37
제4절 선행연구 39
1. 가격형성에 관한 연구 39
2. 규격품질에 관한 연구 40
3. 법적제도에 관한 연구 43
제3장 연구범위와 방법 45
제1절 연구의 범위 45
1. 연구의 범위 45
2. 연구의 내용 45
제2절 연구의 방법 46
1. 설문지 작성 및 구성 46
2. 조사의 방법 47
3. 분석의 방법 51
제4장 조경수 손실보상의 실태분석 53
제1절 조경수 평가방법의 실태분석 53
1. 조경수 용어 실태 53
2. 공익사업법의 조경수 감정평가 분류상 실태분석 58
3. 조경수 감정평가 방법의 실태분석 62
제2절 조경수관련 사건분류별 사례분석 68
1. 임목 68
2. 과수 71
3. 조경수 74
제3절 실증적 분석결과 83
1. 전문가 선정의 특성 83
2. 전문가의 조경수 관련 인식 조사 85
3. 델파이 분석 결과 및 고찰 93
제5장 조경수 감정평가 방법의 개선방안 113
제1절 현행 공익사업법상 개념 정리 113
1. 묘목 개념 113
2. 이식비 114
3. 조경수의 당해 물건의 가격 114
4. 고손율 114
5. 고사의 판정기준 115
제2절 손실보상의 조경수 재분류 116
1. 소비지 조경수 등 118
2. 집하장 조경수 119
3. 생산조경수 119
4. 산지생산 조경수 122
제3절 생산 조경수의 정상식 판정방법 122
1. 교목류 123
2. 묘목류 126
제4절 손실보상의 조경수 감정평가 방법 128
1. 조경수 감정평가 방법의 별도 규정의 필요성 128
2. 소비지 조경수 등의 감정평가 방법 129
3. 집하장 조경수의 감정평가 방법 132
4. 생산조경수 감정평가 방법 133
5. 조경수 감정평가방법의 고려사항 137
제6장 결 론 138

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0