메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

정민경 (건양대학교, 建陽大學校)

지도교수
金永權
발행연도
2017
저작권
건양대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study a total of 84 cases were identified through MALDI-TOF, 74 cases were inspected through VITEKⅡ automated identification equipment using EV6 and PCR method was carried out on 120 cases that were grown in EV6 liquid medium. 46 (38.3%) out of 120 cases, which PCR method was carried out from EV6 liquid medium and grown black, no vancomycin resistance gene was detected. Therefore, PCR method appeared to have many cases requiring unnecessary tests due to many false positives, although it is a quick and sensitive method.
In cases, which were only grown in EV4 and both in EV4 and EV6, no vancomycin resistance gene was detected or vanC results were shown based on PCR genotype results and in 56 cases, which were grown in all of EV4, EV6, EV12 and EV24, MALDI-TOF method utilizing EV6 and EV12 mediums was found to be able to distinguish vanC and Non-vanC VRE since they were confirmed to be strains that had vanA or vanA and vanC genotypes.
Comparing the total times taken, 3-4 days were taken to identify if identified through VITEKⅡ automated identification equipment after plate culture. On the other hand, 1-2 days were taken if cultured in a liquid medium and multiple polymerase chain reaction method was used, and 2 days were taken if identified through MALDI-TOF using Enteroccosel agar with newly designed 12㎍/mL vancomycin. Therefore, both methods were suitable for use as a quick screening test. However, multiple polymerase chain reaction method had too many false positives requiring unnecessary tests and more human resources and cost.
Based on the results of this study, compared to the method using EV medium with 6㎍/mL vancomycin, the method, which detects VRE identified through MALDI-TOF colony grown from Enteroccocel agar with additional 12㎍/mL vancomycin, have been identified to be the method that could be used quick and easy, as it could eliminate vanC and VRE and could also detect VanA and vanB strains equivalently compared to the culture method PCR method that is the most accurate existing VRE monitoring method. In addition, it is a clinically useful method in detecting non-vanC VRE that is important in hospital infection, as it is possible to verify appropriate phenotype and mycetoma.

목차

제 1 장 서 론1
제 2 장 연구대상 및 방법 3
제1절 연구대상 3
제2절 연구방법 4
1. 배지제조 4
2. EV agar를 이용한 MALDI-TOF 동정 4
3. 평판배지배양(EV6) 및 VITEK Ⅱ를 이용한 세균 동정 5
4. 액체배지배양(EV6) 및 다중중합효소연쇄반응 검출법 5
5. 16S rRNA 염기 서열 분석 6
제 3 장 결 과 9
1. 제조된 배지에 따른 세균 배양 및 MALDI-TOF 동정 9
2. EV agar와 MALDI-TOF 를 이용한 VRE 판정 및 동정 11
3. 평판배지배양(EV6)및 VITEK Ⅱ를 이용한 VRE 판정 및 동정 12
4. 액체배지(EV6)를 이용한 PCR법 14
5. MALDI-TOF와 VITEK Ⅱ동정 결과와 VRE 판정 비교 16
제 4 장 고 찰 19
제 5 장 결 론 23
참고문헌 24
요약문 29
감사의 글 31

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0