메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

하헌영 (충남대학교, 忠南大學校 大學院)

지도교수
박기웅
발행연도
2017
저작권
충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수3

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (10)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was conducted to establish effective weed control technologies and pesticide usage safety management methods for the prevention of repeated pesticide treatments. A decennial weed distribution investigation in rice paddy fields was conducted, along with a quadrennial pesticide usage investigation on rice and classification of rice herbicide mechanisms.
The first chapter of this study regards a decennial weed occurrence investigation. This investigation was conducted until the fifth investigation in 2013, to see rice paddy weed change for 50 years, establish weed control technique and predict future weed occurrence.
1. In the 2013 rice paddy weed investigation, perennial weeds had increased for a lengthened reproduction period with early rice-planting. Furthermore, perennial weed tuber survival resulting from tillage reduction and tuber spread from agricultural machines of trust farming companies had increased.
2. Barnyard millet had a dominant portion of 6.9% in 1970, 9.0% in 2000 and 17.3 in 2013. Although annual weeds showed decreasing trends, barnyard millet is increasing not only from the increase of organic rice fields but also occurrence of resistant strains to ACCase-inhibitors in Chungnam/Jeonnam/Jeonbuk.
3. Herbicide resistant weeds are increasing in numbers of species and occurrence areas. Occurring species increased from one in 1998 to 11 in 2012. Occurrence area expanded from 10,000 ha in 1998 to 176,870 ha in 2012.
4. Increases in barnyard millet numbers, the predominance of perennial weeds over annual weeds, the increase in herbicide resistant weeds species/area, and the proliferation of foreign weeds due to climate change and crop changes can be expected.
The second chapter is about quadrennial pesticide usage investigation on rice. This investigation was conducted until the fifth investigation in 2015, to identify pesticide usage patterns in rice and to suggest the improvement of pesticide safety control. One hundred twenty-nine ingredients and 358 products of domestic-registered herbicides have been classified into 9 reaction patterns and 23 sites of action according to HRAC criteria. These pesticide mechanisms are provided to farmers for prevention of repeated pesticide usage and herbicide-resistant weed occurrence.
1. Observance of pesticide safety usage regulations has not improved. Observance rate was 52~53% for method/usage and 43~57% for protective gears. Although registration has an agroworker hazard assessment component, it is important to develop convenient protective gear and to educate farmers on wearing gear properly.
2. Pesticide crop damage and poisoning is not decreasing, it was reported as 8~18% for crop damage and 6~11% for poisoning during the last 5 years. Crop damage is caused by a disregard of label instructions, such as, mixture availability, application season, and dose; therefore, education is needed on use safety guidelines. Spraying with no protective gears in strong sunlight or prolonged periods are major causes of poisoning,; thus, protective gear development and farmer education are required.
3. In decreasing pesticide usage in rice (a.i. kg ha-1),mostreductionresultsfromfungicidesandinsecticidesreductionswhileherbicideusageremainssteady.Declineisobservedinfungicide(2.7→1.3 →1.0 kg) and insecticide (2.2 →1.3 →0.8 kg) but herbicide use is expected to stay still in spite of expected big changes (1.5 →0.9 →1.3 kg).
4. Sulfonylurea herbicide usage has rebounded after a decline (0.05 →0.03 →0.04kg). Out of the 15 rice herbicides used in 2015, 9 SU herbicides were used among 11 registered SUs. SU increase in 2015 is from use of metazosulfuron, which was registered in 2011 and is user friendly for direct spraying. Frequency is decreasing by constant education and substitution with low resistance pesticides.
5. One hundred twenty-nine domestically registered pesticides have been classified into 10 activity mechanisms categories (e.g. fat composition hindrance, amino acid disturbance, photosynthesis hindrance, etc.) and 22 affiliations (accetyl carboxylase inhibition, branched-chain amino acid inhibition, etc.) according to HRAC criteria. Pesticide mechanisms written on product labels is stipulated to prevent herbicide-resistant weed occurrence. This information of pesticide mechanisms will be provided to farmers for prevention of repeated pesticide usage to reduce herbicide-resistant weed occurrence.

목차

목차
Ⅰ. 서언 1
Ⅱ. 연구사 4
<제 1장 국내 논잡초 발생분포 현황> 11
Ⅰ. 서언 12
Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 14
1. 논잡초 발생 조사지점 선정 15
2. 논잡초 발생 조사 방법 및 내용 15
Ⅲ. 결과 17
1. 논잡초 발생 초종 17
2. 논잡초 과별 발생 및 구성 19
3. 우점 논잡초와 저항성 잡초 발생 양상 20
4. 재배양식에 따른 잡초발생 양상 23
5. 재배양식에 따른 우점잡초 변화 양상 25
5.1 기계 이앙 단작 논의 논잡초 발생변화 25
5.2 담수직파 논에서의 주요 우점잡초 27
5.3 이모작 논에서의 주요 우점잡초 28
Ⅳ. 고찰 31
Ⅴ. 적요 32
<제 2장 국내 논제초제 사용 실태 및 작용기작별 분류> 33
Ⅰ. 서언 34
Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법 36
1. 농약 사용실태 조사지역 선정 36
2. 조사방법 및 내용 37
Ⅲ. 결과 38
1. 농약사용 실태에 대한 설문 결과 38
1.1 조사농가의 연령 및 살포 경력 38
1.2 농약 구입처 39
1.3 농약 구입량 40
1.4 농약 선택정보 41
1.5 농약 안전사용 기준 준수 41
1.6 농약 약해 및 중독 경험 43
2. 농가 농약 사용량 조사 44
2.1 농약 살포 횟수 44
2.2 농약 사용량 45
2.3 병해충 발생과 농약사용량 45
2.4 농업기상과 병해충 발생 48
2.5 단위면적당 사용량 TOP 5 농약 51
2.6 농약 사용빈도별 TOP 5 농약 52
2.7 농약의 약제별 농약사용량 52
2.8 수도용 제초제 농약사용량 53
2.9 설포닐우레아 계통 제초제 사용 56
2.10 설포닐우레아 계통 제초제 사용 빈도 58
3. 국내 수도용 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 59
3.1 국내 수도용 제초제의 작용기작에 따른 계통 분류 59
3.2 국내 등록된 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 61
3.3 단일성분 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 62
3.4 2종 합제 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 65
3.5 3종 합제 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 72
3.6 4종 합제 제초제의 작용기작별 분류 81
Ⅳ. 고찰 82
Ⅴ. 적요 84
Ⅵ. 종합고찰 85
Ⅶ. 요약 89
참고문헌 93
ABSTRACT 101

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0