메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

오창원 (강원대학교, 강원대학교 일반대학원)

지도교수
박기봉
발행연도
2017
저작권
강원대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수11

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
도심지 공간에서 자연 녹지의 보급은 한계가 있으므로, 다양한 건축물의 녹지공간 확보 및 아파트 단지내 조경면적 확대, 친환경 주거문화의 시대적 요구 등에 옥상 등 인공지반 녹화의 보급이 급속히 증가되고 있다.
옥상녹화 공법의 시공은 크게 방수층(방근층, 보호 누름콘크리트 포함)공사를 종료하고, 이후 조경공사를 시공한다. 이는 공종별 시공업체가 다르기 때문에 상호간 시공책임의 한계가 있어서 하자발생 가능성이 높고, 공사기간 또한 증가할 수 있다.

본 연구는 기후변화 대응을 위한 시공계획적 방법으로서 옥상녹화 활용확대를 하기 위해 건축 및 조경분야의 융합적 시공할 수 있는 공법 개발의 필요성이 요구된다. 그러나, 대부분의 연구는 녹화공법의 일부인 방수층 또는 방근층에 한정하여 다양한 재료 및 공법에 대한 연구 뿐이며, 배수층, 필터층, 토양층, 식생층을 모두 포함한 공법 연구는 부족한 실정이다.

따라서, 옥상녹화 공법의 보급 확대를 위해서는 공법의 단순화, 일체화, 프리훼브화에 의한 하자 저감 및 공사기간을 단축할 수 있도록 건축 및 조경분야의 통합적 시공법인 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템개발이 필요하다.

옥상녹화 시스템의 구성은 콘크리트구조체 상단에 하단은 스크류, 상단은 폴리머 처리된 비노출형 부착식 금속 디스크로 하이브리드 방수?방근 시트를 구조체에 부착하고, 식생유닛 고정용 앵커를 양면이 폴리머 처리된 비노출형 부착식 금속 디스크로 고주파 접착한 후 사전 생육이 완료된 식재 및 토양을 포함한 앵커 고정용 홈과 유닛박스 상부 토양을 일체화하는 저관리형 인공지반 녹화시스템이다.


이에 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템 목적은 기존 옥상녹화 공법이 다단계 공정으로 진행되어 시공이 복잡하고, 누수 등 하자 발생 가능성이 높으며, 방수공사 및 조경공사의 이원화로 책임시공이 어려운 점 때문에 공정을 일체화 방수·방근시트, 보호콘크리트의 생략, 현장포설, 식생 토양 및 현장 식생의 유닛박스 공법 적용을 통한 프리훼브화, 유닛박스 공법의 고정을 위한 건식 고주파 융착 기술의 적용 신공법을 개발하여, 성능을 시험분석한 결과를 평가해 보고 이를 사용한 신공법의 활용방안을 제시하는 것으로 연구를 진행한 결과 발견된 중요한 내용은 다음과 같다.

첫째 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근 시트 재료의 성능 평가
1.1.1. 물리적 특성
하이브리드 방수?방근 시트의 인장성능, 인열성능, 온도의존성, 가열신축성상, 열화처리후의 인장성능, 신장시의 열화 성상, 접합성상 시험은 KS 기준을 만족하며, 하이브리드 방수·방근 일체형시트의 접합성상 시험결과 무처리, 가열처리, 알칼리처리 시험체 모두 양호한 상태인 결과로 나타났다.
1.1.2. 외력저항성
외력에 대한 패임저항성 및 중량물의 충격에 대한 충격저항성을 시험한 결과 만족하는 것으로 나타났다.
1.1.3. 내구성능
가혹조건을 고려하여, 알칼리 및 산 장기 침지 후 성능 변화, 실제 2년 경과 된 방근성능 시험체의 성능을 평가한 결과 내구성능이 있음을 확인하였다.
1.1.4. 방수성능
인공지반 녹화시스템의 지속적 유지를 위해서는 방수성능이 수압을 15psi부터 1시간 간격으로 증가시켜 100psi에 도달하였을 때도 엔지니어링 PE방수?방근시트를 통하여 투수가 되지 않음을 확인하였다
1.1.5. 방근성능
KS F 4938 “인공지반녹화용 방수 및 방근 재료의 방근성능 시험방법”에 따라 시험체를 제작, 24개월간 14℃~35℃의 온실내에서 평가한 결과, 총6개 시험체에서 모두 식물뿌리의 침입 및 관통이 관찰되지 않았다.

둘째 친환경 인공경량 골재 재료의 성능 평가
2013년도 국토교통부 조경설계기준에서 정하는 평가기준으로 판단할 때, 단위용적중량은 보통 흙 대비, 습윤인 경우 21~29% 가볍고, 보통상태인 경우 54~57% 가벼운 것으로 나타났다. 물리적 성능인 유효수분량 및 투수성은 평가등급 중 상급, 공극율은 중, 하급에 속하는 것으로 분석되었고, 화학적 성능은 pH를 제외한 모든 항목에서 중급 이상의 성능 및 무해성을 갖는 것으로 확인되었다.
셋째 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 성능 평가
1) 구조안전성
인공지반 중 옥상층 녹화에 주로 적용되므로 풍하중에 대하여 건축구조기준 2016 을 참고하여 Midas set 3.3.4를 이용하여 지붕의 풍압을 계산한 결과, 신공법의 부착력과 비교하면, 1.2∼7.0의 안전율로 안전한 것으로 검토되었다.
2) 유닛박스의 내풍압성
인공경량토양을 포설하고 식생이 식재된 유닛박스 시험체 4개를 2×2 형태로 고정 거치대에 고정하고, AAMA 501.1 규격을 평가한 결과 기준을 만족하였다.
3) 단열성능
현대산업개발 기술연구소 옥상층에 기존 유닛시스템(환경신기술 229호, 바이오 유닛)과 신공법을 설치하고 온도측정결과 온도표준편차 및 일최고온도와 일최저온도 신공법이 가장 낮게 나타났는데 이는 단열효과가 우수하기 때문으로 판단할 수 있었다.

넷째 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 실용화 활용방안 평가
1) 경제성 비교에서 신공법은 초기 시공비가 많이 소요되지만 생애주기비용 (LCC, Life Cycle Cost)분석의 비용을 검토할 경우 9% 더 경제적이다.
2) 공사기간 단축은 공정을 일체화 방수·방근시트, 보호콘크리트의 생략, 현장포설, 식생 토양 및 현장 식생의 유닛박스를 이용한 프리훼브화, 유닛박스 공법의 고정용 건식 고주파 융착 기술 적용으로 신공법이 우수하다.
3) 친환경성능 평가에서 기존 방수·방근 공법대비 CO2 저감량, 무근콘크리트 생략에 따른 CO2 저감량, 식생에 따른 CO2 저감량은 총 103,027t ~ 1,030,265t/년의 CO2 저감으로 분석되었다.


이상의 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구에서 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상 녹화시스템은 재료 및 요소기술, 경제성, 공사기간 , 친 환경성 측면에서 우수한 것으로 평가되었다.

향후 옥상녹화 시스템(신공법)의 건축물 에너지 저감형 옥상녹화 유닛 시스템의 상용화 및 보급 활용을 위해서는 현장시공법 지침 및 방수·조경공사의 일원화를 위한 조경기준 등의 규정에 대하여 지속적인 연구가 필요하다고 판단된다.

Because natural green area within city space is limited to supply, aritificial groud green system on a roof is rapidly supplied in response to the demands for acquisition of green space within buildings of a dense city, enlargement of landscape areas inside apartment complexes, and contemporary eco-friendly residential culture.
Roof green system is built after being constructed including protection for root and concrete layers.
This system has limitation of construction responsibility due to various construction works, and qualiy defects are more likely to be defected and also construction duration is increased.

In order to Corespond with climate change, construction development for the integration of architeture and landscape is demanded to enlarge application about Roof green system.

However, current trend of research focuses on partial layers of the green roof system such as waterproof layer and root barriers while neglecting importance of comprehensive research on other layers such as drainage, soil filter, soil, and vegetation layers.
Consequently, a comprehensive green system contributable to reduction in quality defects through prefabrication unification, and simplification of construction processes along with redction in construction duration is needed in order to amplify application of green roof system.
Roof green system is composed of a removable diaphragm, unit box, adhesive plate, P.E waterproof and penetration sheet, matal disk on concrete structure.
This study proposes a hybrid waterproof-roof barrier for green system on artificial ground developed for single purpose on reducing performance deterioration of each layer, and also performs a performance evaluation in order to prove feasibility and applicability of the developed green system. The result of this study is as in the following.
First, in performance evalution for P.E waterproof and root penetration sheet
1. Physical performance
The physical perpormance of hybrid waterproof and root penetration sheet such as tensile strength, tearing strength, temperature dependence, tensile stress of connection part meets KS code. Also, the test specimen of non-treatment, heated-treatment, acali treatment was good condition.

2. Resistence of external force
Resistence of dent and impact for the sheet were satisfied.
3. Durablity
Considering actual construction environment in case of green system application, durabilty of waterproof-root barrier layer is a sufficiently durable as a result of performance of test specimen preserved to be influenced by akali and sulfur, and after planting plants for two year.
4. Waterproof
As a result of testing for waterproofing by supplying 15psi amount of pressure for one hour with 100psi as maximum after filling the inner part of chamber with water, no water leakage was detected.
5. Root barrier
Performance on root barrier or the compound plant (Pirakanta + Sasa borealis) was observed for 24months at the greenhouse under temperture of 14 ~ 35도 with six months as one observation cycle in accordance with test methods of KS F 4938. As a result, no penetration or invasion of root materials were detected neither in the inner container nor internal plates with hybrid test plants.

Second, in performance assessment of eco-friendly artficial light aggregate,
Considering the code of landscape design in ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in 2013, unit volume weight of eco-friendly artificial light aggregate were 21~29% under wet condition and 54~57% under normal condition lighter than common soil. The chresard and water permeability were high level on evalution grade, and the porosity was lower than middle level on phisycal performance. Chemical performance of eco-friendly artificial light aggregate were higher than middle level on all chemical test except pH test and it was detected an unharmful material.

Third, in performance evalution of the application of roof green box unit system combined with engineering P.E waterproof and root penetration sheet,
1. Stability of structure
As a result of wind pressure of the roof using Midas set 3.3.4 in accordence with Korean Building Codes 2016, 1.2~7.0 of safety rate was detected comparing with adhesive force.
2. Wind resistence of a unit box
The result of wind resistence in accordence with AAMA 501.1 met value of codes when artificial soil was installed in order to fixate four unit boxes vegetated with plants on 2×2 matrix.
3. Insulation
The new system was installed on roof of Hyundai Development Company R&D center with a previous unit system (Environmental New Technology 229, bio unit). The effect of insulation was excellent, because temperture standard deviation, high and low temperature daily was lower than a previous system’s.
Fourth, in application evalution of roof green box unit system combined with engineering P.E waterproof and root penetration sheet,
1. The construction cost of new system is higher than a previous system, but Life Cycle Cost is 9% lower than a previous system.
2. The concept of simplication, unification and prefabrication was widely applied to supply green system.
3. The reduction of CO2 according to non-fresh concrete and planting were detected 103,027 ~ 1,030,265 ton per year.
Because of artificial light aggregate made of Bottom-ash as a main material, it constributes to national recycling policy as extending life of a reclaimed land and reduction of landfill cost.

As shown above, Roof green box unit system conbined with engineering P.E waterproof and root penetration sheet was excellent aspects of materials, new system, economics, construction period and eco-friendly.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론··················································
1
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적·······································
1
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법·······································
3
Ⅱ. 옥상녹화 공법의 이론적 고찰·······················
5
1. 국내 기술 동향··········································
5
1) 옥상녹화 공법 기술 현황···································
5
2) 방수? 방근 공법 기술 현황··································
6
2. 국외 기술 동향··········································
7
1) 옥상녹화 공법 기술 현황···································
7
2) 방수? 방근 공법 기술 현황·································
7
3. 옥상녹화 공법 관련 법규 및 제도 기준······················
9
1) 건축법 시행령 제27조······································
9
2) 국토교통부 고시(제2014-46호) 옥상녹화 관련 조경기준···········
10
3) 환경부 생태 면적률 적용지침································
10
4) 국토교통부 고시제2013-383호, 환경부 고시제2013-84호···········
10
5) 지방자치단체의 조례······································
10
6) 서울특별시의 옥상녹화 정책 ·······························
12
4. 옥상녹화 공법 적용 효과··································
14
1) 과학 기술적 측면·········································
14
2) 사회·경제적 측면·········································
15
3) 정책적 측면·············································
16
5. 기존 연구 고찰 및 기존공법과의 차별성·····················
18
1) 기존 연구 고찰···········································
18
2) 기존공법과의 차별성·······································
21
6. 기존 옥상녹화 공법의 문제점 및 대안 설정 연구·············
27
Ⅲ.엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생
유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 구성··················
28
1. 개발 시스템의 목표 설정··································
28
1) 1단계 : 공정이 단순화된 인공지반 녹화 시스템 개발·············
30
2) 2단계 : 비 손상형 건식 방식의 결합방법 개발··················
31
3) 3단계 : 자연스러운 녹화층 형성이 가능한 녹화 시스템의 개발·····
32
2. 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 내용 및 시공 기술 ······················
33
1) 옥상녹화 시스템의 개념····································
33
2) 옥상녹화 시스템의 특징 및 주요성능 ·························
33
3) 비손상형 건식 부착기술 적용································
36
4) 탈착식 격막재 구비 유닛박스 시스템 개발 및 적용··············
37
5) 버텀애쉬를 원료로 제조한 친환경 인공경량토양의 사용···········
38
3. 엔지니어링 PE방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 재료 및 시공법 적용·····················
39
1) 옥상녹화 시스템의 재료 및 시공기술··························
39
2) 옥상녹화 시스템의 순서 및 적용·····························
44
Ⅳ. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생
유닛박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 성능 평가··········
47
1. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근 시트의 물리적 특성···············
47
1) 인장 성능··············································
47
2) 인열 성능··············································
48
3) 온도의존성·············································
49
4) 가열 신축 성상··········································
50
5) 열화처리후의 인장성능···································
51
6) 신장시 열화성상········································
52
7) 접합성상···············································
53
2. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근 시트의 외력 저항성················
54
1) 패임 저항성 시험········································
54
2) 충격 저항성 시험········································
55
3. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트의 내구성·····················
57
1) 내구성 평가 개요········································
57
2) 열화처리 방법··········································
57
3) 알칼리 처리············································
57
4) 황산 처리··············································
58
5) 인장성능···············································
59
6) 인열성능···············································
60
7) 접합 인장강도··········································
60
8) 접합부의 내피로 성능····································
61
4. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트의 방수 성능··················
62
1) 방수 성능··············································
62
5. 엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트의 방근 성능······················
63
1) 방근성능···············································
63
2) 시간 경과에 따른 방근 성능 시험 현황·····················
66
3) 방근 성능 시험 결과·····································
68
6. 인공 경량 토양의 물리적, 화학적, 무해성 성능···············
69
1) 인공 경량 토양의 물리적, 화학적 성능·····················
69
2) 인공 경량 토양의 무해성································
70
7. 구조안정성(stability)·····································
71
1) 경량화를 통한 옥상녹화 시스템의 인공지반 하중부담 저감····
71
2) 풍압에 인한 옥상녹화 시스템의 구조안정성 확보············
73
8. 단열성능················································
77
1) 단열 성능 실험 평가·····································
77
9. 기술의 성능 및 검증 결과·································
80
Ⅴ.엔지니어링 PE 방수·방근시트와 결합된 식생 유닛 박스형 옥상녹화 시스템의 실용화····················
84
1. 현장 적용성 평가·········································
84
1) 시공성·················································
84
2) 유지관리편리성··········································
87
3) 품질향상···············································
88
4) 공사기간 단축···········································
90
2. 경제성 평가··············································
92
1) 설계·시공비 절감 효과···································
93
2) 옥상녹화 신공법과 기존기술과의 공사비 비교분석···········
94
3) 유지관리비용 절감·······································
95
4) 경제성 분석 결과········································
96
3. 친환경성 평가············································
97
4. 현장 적용 사례···········································
99
Ⅵ. 결 론·····················································100
참고문헌···················································· 103
Abstract·····················································106

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0