This study was conducted to develop a simulation-based education program for respiratory infection disease and to identify the effects of the knowledge, clinical competency, self-leadership and critical thinking. after applying to nursing students. A non-equivalent pre-post test of quasi-experimental design was used. The subject of study were 30 students for the experimental group and 30 students for control group. Study participants were a third-year student at college of nursing student. Data analysis were performed using SPSS WIN. Ver. 21.0 with descriptive statistics Fisher''s exact test, Independent t-test, paired t-test and Analysis of covariance. The results of this study are as follows; Hypothesis 1. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher knowledge level than the control group." Knowledge of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 2. “Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher clinical competency than the control group." Clinical competency of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 2-1. “Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher enter isolation room than the control group." Enter isolation room of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 2-2. “Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher oxygen therapy than the control group." Oxygen therapy of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 2-3. “Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher suction therapy than the control group." Suction therapy of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 2-4. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher leave isolation room than the control group." Leave isolation room is no statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was dismissed. Hypothesis 2-5. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher waste management than the control group." Waste management of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 3. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher self-leadership than the control group." Self-leadership of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 3-1. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher behavior-focused strategies than the control group." Behavior-focused strategies of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. Hypothesis 3-2. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher natural reward strategies than the control group." Natural reward strategies is no statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was dismissed. Hypothesis 3-3. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher Constructive thought pattern strategies than the control group." Constructive thought pattern strategies is no statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was dismissed. Hypothesis 4. "Experimental group with simulation-based education program for higher critical thinking than the control group." Critical thinking of the experimental group is higher than the control group and there is statistically significant difference between two groups, therefore, this hypothesis was supported. As a result of this study, simulation-based education program was proven effective in nursing students knowledge, clinical competency, self-leadership and critical thinking was shown to be higher. Therefore, it is considered that simulation-based education should be operated and utilized to cultivate nursing problem solving knowledge, clinical competency, self-leadership or critical thinking by developing a scenario based on various clinical situations.
목차
제 1장 서 론 1제 1절 연구의 필요성 1제 2절 연구의 목적 6제 3절 연구가설 7제 4절 용어의 정의 8제 2장 문헌고찰 10제 1절 호흡기 감염병 10제 2절 시뮬레이션 교육 13제 3절 임상수행능력 18제 4절 셀프리더십 20제 5절 비판적 사고 22제 3장 연구방법 24제 1절 연구설계 24제 2절 연구대상 25제 3절 시뮬레이션 교육 261. 교수자 준비 262. 학습자 준비 263. 프로그램 설계 274. 프로그램 중재 27제 4절 연구도구 291. 호흡기 감염병 관련 지식 292. 임상수행능력 293. 셀프리더십 304. 비판적 사고 30제 5절 자료수집방법 311. 연구보조원 훈련 312. 사전조사 313. 실험군 중재 314. 대조군 중재 325. 사후조사 32제 6절 자료분석 33제 7절 윤리적 고려 34제 4장 연구결과 35제 1절 일반적 특성과 연구변수들의 동질성 검정 351. 일반적 특성의 동질성 검정 352. 연구변수들의 동질성 검정 37제 2절 가설검정 391. 가설 1 검정 392. 가설 2 검정 393. 가설 3 검정 494. 가설 4 검정 55제 5장 논 의 57제 6장 결론 및 제언 62참고문헌 65Abstract 75부 록 79감사의 글 100