메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

강윤미 (경상대학교, 경상대학교 대학원)

지도교수
은영
발행연도
2018
저작권
경상대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수15

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purposes of this study are 1) to identify the relationships between the core competencies of the preceptor and self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, self-leadership, and communication competency; 2) to confirm the influence of self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, self-leadership, and communication competency on the core competence of the preceptor.
The data were collected from August 27 to September 7, 2017 by using structured questionnaires for 127 preceptors at a general hospital located in the southern part of Korea. The core competence of the preceptor was assessed by the core competency evaluation tool developed by In Gak Kwon et al. (2002); self-efficacy by the measurement created by Sherer et al. (1982) and revised by Ae Soon Jeong (2007); critical thinking disposition by the tool used in In Soo Kwon et al. (2006); self-leadership by the assessment tool created by Manz (1983) and revised by Han Seong Kim (2002); communication competency was measured by Rubin et al. (1991)''s tool developed to evaluate human communication competency (GICC), which was modified and supplemented by Gyeong Ho Hur(2003).
SPSS/Win 23.0 Program was used to analyze the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson''s correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression.
The results are as follows:
1) The mean score of the core competencies of the preceptors was 3.94±0.35(range 1-5); the mean score of role models, a sub-area of the core competency of the preceptor, was 3.98±0.42; socialization facilitator was 3.88±0.37; educators was 3.96±0.39; self-efficacy was 3.88±0.49; critical thinking disposition was 3.54±0.36; self-leadership was 3.66±0.39; communication competency was 3.71±0.35.
2) There were no general characteristics showing differences in the core competencies of the preceptors. The subjects'' self-efficacy was significantly different according to age (F=3.44, p=035) and current position (t=-2.02, p=.045). Critical thinking disposition demonstrated a significant difference according to age (F=4.16, p=.018), current position (t=-2.42, p=.017), and total clinical experience (F=4.47, p=.005). Self-leadership of the subjects showed a significant difference according to the current position (t=-2.76, p=.007); communication competency was significantly different among the subjects according to the preceptor training time (t=-2.16, p=.033).
3) The core competencies of the preceptors were significantly correlated with self-efficacy (r=.61, p<.001), critical thinking disposition (r=.69, p<.001), self-leadership (r=.59, p<.001), and communication competency (r=.58, p<.001). Self-efficacy was positively correlated with critical thinking disposition (r=.75, p<.001), self-leadership(r=.62, p<.001), and communication competency (r=.56, p<.001). Critical thinking disposition was positively correlated with self-leadership (r=.70, p<.001) and communication competency (r=.64, p<.001). Self-leadership was positively correlated with communication competency (r=.61, p<.001).
4) The core competencies of the preceptors were affected by critical thinking disposition (β=.54, p<.001), followed by communication competency (β=.24, p<.001). The explanatory power by the factors was 50.7% (F=63.66, p<.001).
Conclusion: The results suggest that critical thinking disposition and communication competency are important predictors of the core competencies of the preceptors. In order to cultivate competent preceptors, it is necessary to develop programs that promote critical thinking disposition and communication competency in preceptor education and training.

목차

I. 서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
3. 용어 정의
II. 문헌고찰
1. 프리셉터 핵심역량
2. 프리셉터 핵심역량과 자기효능감, 비판적 사고성향, 셀프리더십, 의사소통 능력과의 관계
III. 연구방법
1. 연구 설계
2. 연구 대상
3. 연구 도구
4. 자료 수집 방법
5. 윤리적 고려
6. 자료 분석 방법
IV. 연구결과
1. 대상자의 특성
2. 프리셉터 핵심역량의 정도
3. 자기효능감, 비판적 사고성향, 셀프리더십, 의사소통 능력의 정도
4. 일반적 특성에 따른 프리셉터 핵심역량, 자기효능감, 비판적 사고성향, 셀프리더십, 의사소통 능력의 차이
5. 프리셉터 핵심역량과 자기효능감, 비판적 사고성향, 셀프리더십, 의사소통 능력의 상관관계
6. 프리셉터 핵심역량의 영향 요인
V. 논의
VI. 결론 및 제언
1. 결론
2. 제언
참고문헌

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0